Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle

Open access
Maret, Susan·2000·Electronic Green Journal

Abstract

Review: Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle By Carolyn Raffesperger and Joel Tickner, eds. Reviewed by Susan Maret University of Colorado, Denver, USA Raffensperger, Carolyn, and Joel Tickner, eds. Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999. 352 pp. US$30.00. ISBN 1559636882. Recycled, acid-free paper. The Precautionary Principle has its roots in the German principle of Vorsorge, or foresight. In 1970s, the Vorsorgeprinzip (consideration before taking action) was introduced into German environmental law. The Principle was also written into numerous international treaties and conventions, including the Bergen Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Maastricht Treaty on the European Union, the Barcelona Convention, and the Global Climate Change Convention. Although not specifically mentioned in U.S. environmental laws, the spirit of precautionary action and foresight flows through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). It was at the January 29, 1998 Wingspread Conference on the Precautionary Principle the idea of precautionary action was first formally discussed in the U.S. Scientists, policymakers, citizens, philosophers, and regulators representing a variety of groups and countries debated environmental and regulatory issues within the context of precautionary action. At the conclusion of the three-day conference, Wingspread participants issued a statement calling for governments, corporations, communities and scientists to implement the Precautionary Principle into regulatory policymaking. The gist of the Precautionary Principle is as follows: if a practice seems likely to harm the environment, even if proof of harm is not definitive, actions should be taken to eliminate or control the practice. It is within this framework that conference organizers Carolyn Raffensperger and Joel Tickner edited Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Raffensperger is coordinator for the Science and Environmental Health Network, and Tickner, a research associate at the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts, Lowell. This work is an important collection of essays on the Precautionary Principle

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5070/g311210381

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Maret, S.
Venue
Electronic Green Journal
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
1
Issue
12
ISSN
1076-7975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1833061189
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5070/g311210381
The paper
Maret, S. (2000). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Electronic Green Journal. https://doi.org/10.5070/g311210381

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.