The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management
Open accessAbstract
Review: Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management By Julia M. Wondolleck and Steven L. Yaffee Reviewed by Donny Roush Idaho Environmental Education Association, USA Julia M. Wondolleck & Steven L. Yaffee. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2000. 277pp. ISBN 1-55963-462-6 (paper). US$25.00. Recycled, acid- free paper. During the last two decades, Wondolleck and Yaffee have examined the emergence of more than 200 collaborative groups working on natural resource issues. Their observations and the lessons they draw from them are brought together in this work. In it, they succeed in chronicling the rise of civic- environmental efforts and establishing an adequate reference for those involved. Their work falls slightly short of being an ideal how-to volume for those same people, however. The book's three-part organization provides a structure that manages to be academic without dry weightiness. Part I establishes the conceptual framework on which their lessons and suggestions hang. Part II lays out eight key factors the authors deduced from successful collaborations. Part III shifts into an instructional tone and aims to guide collaborators in their work. Findings and citations of the work of others are supported by ample endnotes. Wondolleck and Yaffee's findings boil down to this: In successful collaborative partnerships that we studied, individuals and organizations lived up to their commitments. They did what they said they would do (p. 148). While this essence is simplistic, it is not overly so. Many less-than-successful collaborations could have benefited from the application of this lesson. Other key factors for making collaboration work have the same clang of the obvious. Take for example, build on common ground or focus on the problem in new and different ways. But, to the best of the authors' knowledge, these are the elements of effective collaborations. Listing them is important. Still, like components of suitable habitat or crystalline substances in a gemstone, the arrangement of these elements may be more important to the final product. Future studies of collaboration should shed more light on the best ways of putting these elements together.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · Cited by 5,814
Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399713481601 · Cited by 1,514
A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06824-190356 · Cited by 868
What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?
Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x · Cited by 696
Metadata
- Authors
- Roush, D.
- Venue
- Electronic Green Journal
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1076-7975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1526299364
- Cited by
- 1,280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 205.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5070/g311610473
- The paper
- Roush, D. (2002). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Electronic Green Journal. https://doi.org/10.5070/g311610473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.