Cited by 2Sports Performance and TrainingCOVID-19 and Mental HealthSport Psychology and Performance

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pro and advanced cycling athletes: A cross-sectional study in Poland

Open access
Rzymski, Pawel, Rzymski, Piotr, Burzynski, Bartlomiej, Jurys, Tomasz, Knapik, Michalina, Rzymska, Izabela·2022·Archives of Medical Science

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected different communities, yet the data on its impact on cyclists, is scarce. Material and methods: The present study assessed the training patterns of pro and advanced amateur cycling athletes in Poland (n=130) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic season and in relation to their epidemiological situation and quality of life factors. Results: The volume and weekly frequency of training was not decreased during the pandemic. However, their High-Intensity Interval Trainings (weekly 31.6 vs. 37.0 min, p=0.004) and maximum weekly Training Stress Score (660 vs. 715, p=0.001) decreased. Compared to uninfected cyclists, those who contracted the SARS-CoV-2 registered a higher score in the somatic, social and environmental domain of the WHO-QoL questionnaire (56.1 vs. 50.6, p=0.024; 74.1 vs. 63.6, p=0.032 and 72.5 vs. 65.9, p=0.018, respectively); no changes were observed in the psychologic domain Change in the weekly frequency of training, volume, time spent in >90% and 80-90% of HRmax (min) correlated positively only with the somatic domain of the WHO-QoL. The training pattern of cyclists who experienced death to COVID-19 among their relatives remained unaffected, but they presented a lower psychologic domain in the WHO-QoL (64.5 vs. 69.2, p=0.02). Conclusions: Cycling pro and advanced amateurs maintained their volume and frequency of training but reduced its intensity during the pandemic compared to 2019. Changes were more likely to be affected by their physical status than by their psychogenic condition. The pandemic had a limited effect on the training pattern of cycling athletes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/aoms/155211

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical activity was strongly associated with a reduced risk of severe COVID-19 complications among infected adults.

    “Physical activity was also strongly associated with a reduced risk of severe COVID-19 complications among infected adults [24,25,26].”

    From The Effect of Vinyasa Yoga Practice on the Well-Being of Breast-Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (Training patterns; page unavailable) report that infected cyclists had mild or no symptoms and recovered without severe complications. The paper does not compare complication risk by physical-activity level or establish a strong association among infected adults generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. Wiley, USA 1977.
  2. [24]WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 551– 8. 9626712
  3. [44]Hawthorne G, Herrman H, Murphy B. Interpreting the WHOQOL-Brèf: preliminary population norms and effect sizes. Soc Indic Res 2006; 77: 37– 59.

Authors
Rzymski, P., Rzymski, P., Burzynski, B., Jurys, T., Knapik, M., & Rzymska, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mothers' and Child's Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Gynecologic and Obstetrical University Hospital, Polna St 33, 60-535 Poznan, Poland
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL)
  • Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical Universit of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
Venue
Archives of Medical Science
Published
2022-10-28
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
110-120
ISSN
  • 1734-1922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1896-9151
OpenAlex
W4307700584
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cyclists, professional cyclists, training patterns, high-intensity interval training, quality of life, exercise intensity, Poland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review