Cited by 12Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Emotion recognition and moral utilitarianism in the dark triad of personality.

Open access
Amiri, Sohrab, Behnezhad, Sepideh·2017·Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Introduction:In the last decade, the dark triad of personality has attracted a great deal of attention in studies.However, little is known about the emotional and moral defects in such circumstances. Aim of the study:To evaluate emotion recognition and utilitarianism in moral decision-making in people with dark triad personality tendencies.Material and methods: Three hundred and ninety girl students (with an average age of 22.7 years and a standard deviation of 2.66) were selected in 2017.Then 120 of them were selected for the second stage according to cluster analysis on the Dark Triad Scale (SD3); as Machiavellian, psychopathic, and narcissistic.Finally, participants were studied in emotion recognition using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) and moral decision-making. Results:The results showed that there is a significant difference between the dark triad personality groups in emotion recognition and moral decision making.Participants with dark triad traits have lower performance in emotion recognition.The comparison groups in impersonal moral decision-making showed that participants with psychopathic tendencies showed more utilitarianism.Conclusions: It can be concluded that people with Machiavellian, psychopathic, and narcissistic personality tendencies, as dark dimensions of personality, have deficiencies in emotional aspects and moral decision making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/nan.2017.74142

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Violent male offenders with antisocial and narcissistic traits have significant criminal careers.

    “Amiri and Behnezhad (48) highlighted that violent male offenders with “antisocial and narcissistic” traits have significant criminal careers.”

    From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Participants and procedure section describes a sample of female university students, not violent male offenders. The Introduction discusses narcissism and antisocial behaviour as traits, but neither it nor the searched passages address offenders’ criminal careers (searched: violent male offenders, criminal careers, antisocial and narcissistic traits). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM. Assessing psy- chopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalised popula- tion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 151-158.
  2. Amiri S, Yaghoubi A. Evaluating the Psychometric proper- ties of dark triad traits scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 2017; 6: 77-97.
  3. Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SSD3): A brief measure of dark personality trait. Asses- sment 2014; 21: 28-41.
  4. Amiri S, Hasani J, Abdollahi MH. The effect of inducing emotional experiences in personal and impersonal mo- ral judgement, regarding Behavioral Activation System (BAS) and Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS). J Res Psy- chol Health 2014; 7: 36-46.
  5. Amiri S, Hasani J, Abdollahi MH. Personal and impersonal moral judgement regarding Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System. J Psychol 2015; 11: 22-36.
  6. Jonason PK, Webster GD, Schmitt DP, et al. The antihero in popular culture: A life history theory of the Dark Triad. Rev Gen Psychol 2012; 16: 192-199.
  7. Egan V, Chan S, Shorter GW. The Dark Triad, happiness and subjective wellbeing. Pers Individ Dif 2014; 67: 17-22.
  8. Bartels DM, Pizarro DA. The measure of morals: Antiso- cial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to mo- ral dilemmas. Cognition 2011; 121: 154-161.

Authors
Amiri, S., & Behnezhad, S.
Affiliations
  • Urmia University (IR)
  • Kharazmi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Amiri, Sohrab
Venue
Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia
Published
2017
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
135-142
ISSN
1896-6764 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794212944
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Dark Triad, emotion recognition, utilitarianism, ethical decision-making, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, narcissism, moral judgment, emotional deficits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review