Cited by 22Ethics in medical practiceEmpathy and Medical EducationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Narrative writing as a strategy for nursing ethics education in Japan

Open access
Tsuruwaka, Mari, Asahara, Kiyomi·2018·International Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of learning ethics of nursing practice using narrative writing. METHODS: Study design was qualitative descriptive research. The participants were 90 graduate students who took nursing ethics classes, of whom 86 graduate students (4 males and 82 females) agreed to this study. The data gathered for analysis were their narratives described as feeling uncomfortable in clinical settings and their comment sheets after narrative group work in nursing ethics classes. We used qualitative content analysis to identify graduate students' awareness gained through narrative writing and narrative group work. RESULTS: As a feature of the scenes described by graduate students, there were often conflicts that patients' autonomy were not respected, or that they were not able to engage in sincere engagement. The narrative writing was effective to make graduate students aware of the following two aspects: 1) habits and trends in one's own thoughts and 2) organizational and administrative issues related to ethical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Learning ethics of nursing practice using narrative writing that focused on nurses' sentiments helped reveal nurses' thoughts as well as their attitudes and approaches to patients. These findings suggest that narrative writing in nursing ethics education could lead to ethical practice. Additionally, our results indicate that narrative writing in research may be helpful as a strategy to clarify ethical issues and the awareness of nurses in clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5116/ijme.5b39.d5d2

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  2. [2]Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical ethics-a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.
  3. [4]Howard B. Story of sickness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
  4. [19]Charon R The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001 286 1897 1902 11597295
  5. [22]Sandelowski M We are the stories we tell: narrative knowing in nursing practice. J Holist Nurs 1994 12 23 33 10.1177/089801019401200105 7806848 · DOI
  6. [31]Cooper RW Frank GL Hansen MM Gouty CA Key ethical issues encountered in healthcare organizations: the perceptions of staff nurses and nurse leaders. J Nurs Adm 2004 34 149 156 15024242
  7. [33]Atabay G Çangarli BG Penbek Ş Impact of ethical climate on moral distress revisited: multidimensional view. Nurs Ethics 2015 22 103 116 10.1177/0969733014542674 25106456 · DOI
  8. [34]Koskenvuori J Numminen O Suhonen R Ethical climate in nursing environment. Nurs Ethics 2017 969733017712081 10.1177/0969733017712081 28659068 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsuruwaka, M., & Asahara, K.
Affiliations
St. Luke's International University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tsuruwaka, Mari
Venue
International Journal of Medical Education
Published
2018-07-19
Volume
9
Pages
198-205
ISSN
2042-6372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884164493
Cited by
22
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24790514)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
narrative writing, nursing ethics education, nursing ethics, patient autonomy, nurses' attitudes, moral consciousness, graduate nursing students, clinical ethics
MeSH terms
Data Anonymization, Education, Nursing, Emotions, Ethics, Nursing, Female, Humans, Japan, Learning, Male, Students, Nursing, Writing, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review