The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Penerapan Metode Manajemen Proyek dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Perpustakaan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi
Open accessAbstract
Penulisan Best Practice ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan metode manajemen proyek dapat meningkatkan kualitas perpustakaan berbasis teknologi informasi di SMP Negeri 2 Kasihan. Metode penulisan Best Practice ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan ialah observasi partisipasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Penulisan Best Practice dilakukan dengan melaksanakan lima tahapan utama yaitu identifikasi kegiatan, penyusunan urutan kegiatan, perkiraan waktu kegiatan, penyusunan jadwal kegiatan, dan pengendalian jadwal kegiatan. Hasil penerapan manajemen proyek menunjukkan nilai kualitas rata rata perpustakaan sebelum dilakukan tindakan sebesar 2.28 dan setelah dilakukan tindakan sebesar 4.23 sehingga terdapat kenaikan kualitas sebesar 85%. Peningkatan kualitas perpustakaan terjadi karena aspek sarana prasarana perpustakaan mengalami peningkatan sebesar 81%, sebelum dilakukan tindakan nilai kualitas sebesar 2.5 dan setelah dilakukan tindakan sebesar 4.0. Aspek manajemen perpustakaan berbasis teknologi informasi mengalami peningkatan sebesar100% dari rata-rata kualitas sebelum tindakan sebesar 2.2 dan setelah tindakan sebesar 4.4. Peningkatan yang memiliki kontribusi besar pada penerapan teknologi informasi yaitu pada aspek otomasi perpustakaan yang menunjukkan peningkatan sebesar 150% karena kualitas sebelum tindakan sebesar 2.0 dan setelah dilakukan tindakan sebesar 5.0. Sementara aspek penggunaan komputer yang terhubung pada internet meningkat sebesar 100%. Penggunaan komputer terhubung dengan WiFi meningkat sebesar 67%. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan metode manajemen proyek dapat meningkatkan kualitas perpustakaan berbasis teknologi dan informasi di SMP Negeri 2 Kasihan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Application of the method, the PERT method is used in planning and controlling projects that have never been carried out before, while the CPM method is used to plan and control activities that have been carried out previously so that the time, data and costs of each activity item are known by the evaluator in advance [19] .”
From Application of Project Management using CPM (Critical Path Method) and Pert (Project Evaluation and Review Technique) in the Nava House Bekasi Cluster Housing Development Project (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi di Perpustakaan
Fahrizandi, F. (2020) · TIK ILMEU Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi · doi:10.29240/tik.v4i1.1160 · Cited by 75
Mengelola perpustakaan sekolah
Sinaga, D. P. (2007) · Cited by 59
PERANAN DESAIN INTERIOR PERPUSTAKAAN DALAM MENUMBUHKAN MINAT PADA RUANG PERPUSTAKAAN
Noviani, R., Rusmana, A., & Rodiah, S. (2014) · Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan · doi:10.24198/jkip.v2i1.11626 · Cited by 25
Teknologi informasi perpustakaan : strategi perencanaan perpustakaan digital
Supriyanto, W., & Muhsin, A. (2012) · Cited by 13
Penerapan Teknologi Informasi di Perpustakaan Umum Multimedia Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan
Jumadin, S. H. (2014) · Cited by 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zulfiah, E., Putri, N. N. N., & Fadhilah, M. (2023) · Ideguru Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru · doi:10.51169/ideguru.v8i3.606 · Cited by 33
Analisis Praktik Kepemimpinan Servant Leadership para Kepala Sekolah TK/PAUD Katolik
Bora, I., Gomes, F. D., Banggur, M. D. V., Sum, T. A., & Lubienki, M. R. (2024) · Murhum Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini · doi:10.37985/murhum.v5i1.565 · Cited by 7
Analisis Komprehensif Terhadap Peran Manajer Proyek Dalam Mengelola Proyek Yang Kompleks
Dika, R. Y., Pahlevi, M. F., & Agustin, A. R. (2023) · Jurnal ilmiah Sistem Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer · doi:10.55606/juisik.v3i2.501 · Cited by 3
Garninda, F., Fitra, A., Kustiwan, S., & Wiyatno, T. N. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul120 · Cited by 1
Yusri, Y., & Wibowo, Y. (2023) · JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION · doi:10.55681/jige.v4i3.940 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Prasetya, H.
- Corresponding author
- Prasetya, Heri
- Venue
- Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru
- Published
- 2021-09-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2527-5712 (ISSN-L)
- 2722-2195
- OpenAlex
- W3197691012
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ideguru Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Engineering and Information Technology
- Keywords
- project management, library quality improvement, school libraries, library automation, library facilities, library management, project scheduling, junior high school library, best practice guide, library staff training, library budgeting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
