Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 11scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Graphical and video abstracts are not associated with increased Altmetric attention score or citations in sport science.

Open access
Bennett, Hunter, Slattery, Flynn·2022
DOI 10.51224/srxiv.147
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51224/srxiv.147

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Aggarwal, V. (2021). Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: A retrospective cohort study. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38 (4), 259267. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ hir. 12376
  2. Bennett, H., & Slattery, F. (2022). Graphical and video abstracts are not associated with increased Altmetric attention score or citations in sport science. SportRχiv . https:// doi. org/ 10. 51224/ SRXIV. 147
  3. Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (4), 895-903.
  4. Büchi, M. (2017). Microblogging as an extension of science reporting. Public Understanding of Science, 26 (8), 953-968. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09636 62516 657794
  5. Chapman, S. J., Grossman, R. C., FitzPatrick, M. E. B., & Brady, R. R. W. (2019). Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media. British Journal of Surgery, 106 (12), 1611-1616. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ bjs. 11307
  6. Chisari, E., Gouda, Z., Abdelaal, M., Shields, J., Stambough, J. B., Bellamy, J., & Krueger, C. A. (2021). A crossover randomized trial of visual abstracts versus plain-text tweets for disseminating orthopedics research. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 36 (8), 3010-3014. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. arth. 2021. 04. 006
  7. Doubleday, Z. A., & Connell, S. D. (2017). Publishing with objective charisma: Breaking science's paradox. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32 (11), 803-805. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. tree. 2017. 06. 011
  8. Dowling, G. R. (2014). Playing the citations game: From publish or perish to be cited or sidelined. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 22 (4), 280-287. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ausmj. 2014. 09. 005
  9. Ferreira, M., Lopes, B., Granado, A., Freitas, H., & Loureiro, J. (2021). Audio-visual tools in science communication: The video abstract in ecology and environmental sciences [original research]. Frontiers in Communication . https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fcomm. 2021. 596248
  10. Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77 (2), 167-187. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00031 22412 438225
  11. Harzing, A.-W. (2019). Two new kids on the block: How do crossref and dimensions compare with google scholar, microsoft academic, scopus and the web of science? Scientometrics, 120 (1), 341349. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11192- 019- 03114-y
  12. Hoffberg, A. S., Huggins, J., Cobb, A., Forster, J. E., & Bahraini, N. (2020). Beyond journals-visual abstracts promote wider suicide prevention research dissemination and engagement: A randomized crossover trial. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 5 , 564193. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ frma. 2020. 564193
  13. Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28 (7), 759-777. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09636 62519 869097
  14. Hullman, J., & Bach, B. (2018). Picturing science: Design patterns in graphical abstracts diagrammatic representation and inference . Springer.
  15. Ibrahim, A. M., Lillemoe, K. D., Klingensmith, M. E., & Dimick, J. B. (2017). Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: A prospective, case-control crossover study. Annals of Surgery, 266 (6), 46-48.
  16. Khan, M. N., Faraz, A., Jamal, A. B., Craig, S., Ilyas, W., Ahmad, F., Jamshed, M., & Riaz, W. (2021). A study to see the effect of social media usage among healthcare providers. Cureus, 13 (7), 16350.
  17. Kim, Y., Lee, J., Yoo, J. J., Jung, E. A., Kim, S. G., & Kim, Y. S. (2022). Seeing is believing: The effect of graphical abstracts on citations and social media exposure in gastroenterology & hepatology journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37 (45), e321. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3346/ jkms. 2022. 37. e321
  18. Koo, K., Aro, T., & Pierorazio Phillip, M. (2019). Impact of social media visual abstracts on research engagement and dissemination in urology. Journal of Urology, 202 (5), 875-877. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ JU. 00000 00000 000391
  19. Linton, J. D., Tierney, R., & Walsh, S. T. (2011). Publish or perish: How are research and reputation related? Serials Review, 37 (4), 244-257. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. serrev. 2011. 09. 001
  20. Liu, X. L., Gai, S. S., Zhang, S. L., & Wang, P. (2015). An analysis of peer-reviewed scores and impact factors with different citation time windows: A case study of 28 ophthalmologic journals. PLoS ONE, 10 (8), e0135583. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 01355 83
  21. Oska, S., Lerma, E., & Topf, J. (2020). A picture is worth a thousand views: A triple crossover trial of visual abstracts to examine their impact on research dissemination [original paper]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (12), e22327. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 22327
  22. Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M., Pferschy, U., Wang, D., Mocan, A., & Atanasov, A. G. (2016). Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper? Molecules, 21 (9), 1247.
  23. Ramos, E., & Concepcion, B. P. (2020). Visual abstracts: Redesigning the landscape of research dissemination. Seminars in Nephrology, 40 (3), 291-297. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. semne phrol. 2020. 04. 008
  24. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24 (3), 183-195. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1087/ 20110 306
  25. Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 12 (2), 430-435. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. joi. 2018. 03. 006
  26. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8 (5), e64841-e64841. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00648 41
  27. Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512 (7513), 126-129. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 51212 6a
  28. Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10 (2), 365-391. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. joi. 2016. 02. 007
  29. Yoon, J., & Chung, E. (2017). An investigation on graphical abstracts use in scholarly articles. International Journal of Information Management, 37 (1), 1371-1379. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijinf omgt. 2016. 09. 005
  30. Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). The impact of video abstract on citation counts: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics. Scientometrics, 119 (3), 17151727. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11192- 019- 03108-w

Cited by

See all 11

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, H., & Slattery, F.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
ORCID
Publisher
University of Ottawa Library
Published
2022-04-29
DOI
10.51224/srxiv.147
OpenAlex
W4225155520
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
graphical abstracts, video abstracts, Altmetric Attention Score, citation impact, research visibility, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphical and video abstracts are not associated with increased Altmetric attention score or citations in sport science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.51224/srxiv.147
The paper
Bennett, H., & Slattery, F. (2022). Graphical and video abstracts are not associated with increased Altmetric attention score or citations in sport science. https://doi.org/10.51224/srxiv.147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.