The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Men of Mobtown: Policing Baltimore in the Age of Slavery and Emancipation
Abstract
What if racialized mass incarceration is not a perversion of our criminal justice system’s liberal ideals, but rather a natural conclusion? Adam Malka raises this disturbing possibility through a gripping look at the origins of modern policing in the influential hub of Baltimore during and after slavery’s final decades. He argues that America’s new professional police forces and prisons were developed to expand, not curb, the reach of white vigilantes, and are best understood as a uniformed wing of the gangs that controlled free black people by branding them—and treating them—as criminals. The post–Civil War triumph of liberal ideals thus also marked a triumph of an institutionalized belief in black criminality. Mass incarceration may be a recent phenomenon, but the problems that undergird the “new Jim Crow” are very, very old. As Malka makes clear, a real reckoning with this national calamity requires not easy reforms but a deeper, more radical effort to overcome the racial legacies encoded into the very DNA of our police institutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Baltimore, the police force transformed from including any White person empowered to regulate Black bodies to a formalized state power aimed at the protection of property.”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Malka 2018
In the citing paper
“As Adam Malka has shown, the police in the nineteenth century were primarily concerned with protecting property rights and liberal notions of subjecthood.”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Malka 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mass Criminalization of Black Americans: A Historical Overview
Hinton, E., & Cook, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306 · Cited by 247
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Malka, A.
- Corresponding author
- Malka, Adam
- Venue
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of North Carolina Press
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- OpenAlex
- W4253361867
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- Baltimore, post-Civil War era, free Black people, Black criminality, prisons, gangs, racial legacy, The New Jim Crow, criminal justice reform, racialization of crime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review