The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Debating Yoga and Mindfulness in Public Schools: Reforming Secular Education or Reestablishing Religion?
Abstract
The introduction explains how yoga, mindfulness, and meditation entered the U.S. cultural mainstream, including public schools, between the 1970s and 2010s, and why it matters for education, law, and religion. In the 1960s, the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited public schools from endorsing prayer and devotional Bible reading. Yoga and meditation advocates reframed these practices as secular by downplaying religious beliefs and advertising scientific evidence of health benefits and cultivation of universal morality and ethics. Certain promoters used tactics of self-censorship, camouflage, code-switching, or frontstage/backstage behaviour to win a “Vedic Victory” or skilfully advance “stealth Buddhism.” Drawing on the author’s experience as an expert witness in four legal challenges, the introduction examines key terms: “yoga,” “mindfulness,” “meditation,” “Hinduism,” “Buddhism,” “religion,” “secularity,” “spirituality” and “science.” Because meanings of these terms are contested, social institutions such as schools and courts must arbitrate disputes by formulating and applying definitions for policy purposes. The introduction argues that the school programs considered are both secular and religious, and that their integration into public-school curricula may result in an unrecognized, fundamental historic and legal transformation: the reestablishment of religion in America.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Brown (2019) has pointed out, efforts at informed consent are often complicated and undermined by 'code-switching' and 'frontstage/backstage' behaviour in which secular, psychological lan guage is used strategically to market meditation while masking religious ends.”
From The Teacher Matters: The Role and Impact of Meditation Teachers in the Trajectories of Western Buddhist Meditators Experiencing Meditation-Related Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Brown (2019)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness for Global Public Health: Critical Analysis and Agenda
Oman, D. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-023-02089-5 · Cited by 87
Galante, J., Stochl, J., Dufour, G., Vainre, M., Wagner, A. P., & Jones, P. B. (2021) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214390 · Cited by 68
K. Canby, N., R. Lindahl, J., J. Cooper, D., Joseph, N., Palitsky, R., & Britton, W. B. (2025) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2025.2485677 · Cited by 6
Contemporary Globalized and Commercialized Yoga
Black, S. (2022) · Oxford Bibliographies in Hinduism · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0260 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, C. G.
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Candy Gunther
- ORCID
- Brown, Candy Gunther
- Venue
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of North Carolina Press
- Published
- 2019-05-06
- OpenAlex
- W4205903506
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Religious Education and Schools
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Keywords
- yoga, mindfulness, meditation, public schools, secularism, religion in schools, Hinduism, Buddhism, spirituality, science and religion, school curriculum, legal challenges, expert testimony, code-switching, American religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review