The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Young Lords: A Radical History
Abstract
Against the backdrop of America’s urban rebellions in the 1960s, an unexpected cohort of New York radicals unleashed a series of urban guerrilla actions against the city’s racist policies and contempt for the poor. They occupied a hospital, took over a church, paralyzed traffic with uncollected garbage, tested children for lead poisoning, defended prisoners, fought the military police, and fed breakfast to poor children. Their dramatic flair, uncompromising vision for a new society, and skill in linking local problems to international crises riveted the media, alarmed New York’s political class, and challenged nationwide perceptions of civil rights and black power protest. The group called itself the Young Lords. Utilizing oral histories, archival records, and an enormous cache of police records released only after a decade-long Freedom of Information Law request and subsequent court battle, Johanna Fernández has written the definitive history of the Young Lords, from its roots as a Chicago street gang to its rise and fall as a political organization in New York. Led by working-class Puerto Rican youth and modelled after the Black Panther Party, the Young Lords confronted race and class inequality and questioned U.S. foreign policy. Their imaginative protests and media savvy tactics won reforms, popularized socialism, and exposed America’s imperial project in Puerto Rico. Fernández challenges what we think we know about the sixties. In riveting style, she demonstrates how the…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Johanna Fernández has shown in an exhaustive study of the Young Lords organization that police repression politicized a new generation of Puerto Rican activists.”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Fernández 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernández, J.
- Corresponding author
- Fernández, Johanna
- Venue
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of North Carolina Press
- Published
- 2020-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W3011712852
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
- Keywords
- Young Lords, Puerto Rican activism, New York City, Black Panther Party, civil rights movement, Black Power, urban revolt, police repression, lead poisoning, socialism, Puerto Rican independence movement, US foreign policy, race and class inequality, 1960s protest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review