The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership
Abstract
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, reeling from a wave of urban uprisings, politicians finally worked to end the practice of redlining. Reasoning that the turbulence could be calmed by turning Black city-dwellers into homeowners, they passed the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and set about establishing policies to induce mortgage lenders and the real estate industry to treat Black homebuyers equally. The disaster that ensued revealed that racist exclusion had not been eradicated, but rather transmuted into a new phenomenon of predatory inclusion. Race for Profit uncovers how exploitative real estate practices continued well after housing discrimination was banned. The same racist structures and individuals remained intact after redlining’s end, and close relationships between regulators and the industry created incentives to ignore improprieties. Meanwhile, new policies meant to encourage low-income homeownership created new methods to exploit Black homeowners. The federal government guaranteed urban mortgages in an attempt to overcome resistance to lending to Black buyers – as if unprofitability, rather than racism, was the cause of housing segregation. Bankers, investors, and real estate agents took advantage of the perverse incentives, targeting the Black women most likely to fail to keep up their home payments and slip into foreclosure, multiplying their profits. As a result, by the end of the 1970s, the nation’s first programs to encourage Black homeownership ended with tens of thousands of foreclosures in Black communities across the country. The push to uplift Black homeownership had descended into a goldmine for realtors and mortgage lenders, and a ready-made cudgel for the champions of deregulation to wield against government intervention of any kind. Narrating the story of a sea-change in housing policy and its dire impact on African Americans, Race for Profit reveals how the urban core was transformed into a new frontier of cynical extraction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“racially biased state and national policies around housing, employment, education, and the economy, alongside racial discrimination, have prevented Black Americans from accumulating wealth (also see Katznelson, 2005; Rothstein, 2018; Taylor, 2019).”
From Wealth, Race, and Under-Addressed Financial Need in Federal Student Aid Policy (2025) · cites this paper as Taylor, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Case for Letting Anthropology Burn: Sociocultural Anthropology in 2019
Jobson, R. C. (2020) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13398 · Cited by 431
Cottom, T. M. (2020) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649220949473 · Cited by 284
The Wealth Inequality of Nations
Pfeffer, F. T., & Waitkus, N. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211027800 · Cited by 264
We Built This: Consequences of New Deal Era Intervention in America’s Racial Geography
Faber, J. W. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420948464 · Cited by 228
The urban process under racial capitalism: Race, anti-Blackness, and capital accumulation
Dantzler, P. A. (2021) · Journal of Race Ethnicity and the City · doi:10.1080/26884674.2021.1934201 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, K.-Y.
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta
- Venue
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of North Carolina Press
- Published
- 2019-10-21
- OpenAlex
- W4234153941
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 72.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of North Carolina Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Keywords
- redlining, Black homeownership, predatory lending, mortgage lending, real estate industry, foreclosure, Black women, residential segregation, urban revolt, deregulation, federal housing policy, African American community
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review