The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of User Experience in Integrated Learning Information Systems Using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)
Open accessAbstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has a role in assisting in monitoring and evaluating the learning process in schools. Integrated Learning Information System is the application of an integrated information system to improve the quality of academic and learning services accessed by all school members (teachers, homeroom teachers, foundations, and students) and parents/guardians of students. The learning information system focuses on making it easier to monitor and evaluate student academic and learning outcomes. User experience measurement is carried out to determine the extent to which the success of user understanding using the system so that the purpose of using the system can be achieved. This study aims to analyze the user experience of the Integrated Learning Information System using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) method. This study uses quantitative data by distributing online questionnaires to 50 students. The results of the evaluation of user experience on learning information systems using the UEQ method state that attractiveness is 2.121, perspicuity is 2.152, efficiency is 2.319, dependability is 1.505, stimulation is 1.716, and novelty is 1.020. This proves that all aspects have positive values. The benchmark results showed that the attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, and stimulation aspects were included in the excellent criteria, while the dependability aspect was included in the good criteria and novelty included in the above average criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) is one of the widely accepted tools for measuring software usability across six dimensions: attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty (Al-Pratama et al., 2022).”
From Development of a Web-Based Information System for Smartphone Repair Services at OSDIG Store Using the Waterfall Method (2025) · cites this paper as Al-Pratama et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schrepp (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.2815.0245 · Cited by 147
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- A. A. Aziz, A. N. Arifin, dan F. Daud, 2021, "Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Evaluasi Pembelajaran Digital ISpring bagi Guru Sekolah Menengah kabupaten Gowa", SMART: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 1, no. 1, pp 1-8.
- S. R. Henim dan R. P. Sari, 2020, "User Experience Evaluation of Student Academic Information System of Higher Education Using User Experience Questionnaire," J. Komput. Terap., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69-78, 2020, doi: 10.35143/jkt.v6i1.3582. · DOI
- Hassenzahl, M, 2008, "User Experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality", Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme Machine.
- L.E. Law, R., & M, H., 2008, "Understanding, scoping and defining user experience", Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI 09.
- Tullis, T., & Albert, B., 2010, "Measuring the user experience: collecting, analysing, and presenting usability matrics. Measuring the User Experience (Second Edition). Retrieved from http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415781-1.00007-8 · DOI
- S. F. Novitasari, Y. T. Mursityo, and A. N. Rusydi, 2020, "Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna Pada E-Commerce Sociolla.Com Menggunakan Usability Testing Dan User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)," J. Sist. Informasi, Teknol. Informasi, dan Edukasi Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57- p-ISSN: 2656-5935 http://journal-isi.org/index.php/isi e-ISSN: 2656-4882
- Arista Pratama, Asif Faroqi, at all | 1029 63, 2020, doi: 10.25126/justsi.v1i2.9. · DOI
- H. B. Santoso, Martin Schreep, dkk, 2016, " Measuring User Experience of the Student-Centered e-Learning Environment", The Journal of Educators Online (JEO), vol .13, no. 1, pp. 58-79.
- Diaz-Oreiro, I., Gustavo, L., Quesada, L., & Guerrero, L. A., 2019, "Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review", 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence UCAmI. Toledo: MDPI.
- Y. Sari, M. Arafah, and Novitasari, 2021, "Evaluasi Usability Sistem Informasi Akademik Dosen Menggunakan User Experience Questionnaire dan Heuristic Walkthrough," J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 247-253, doi: 10.29207/resti.v5i2.3022. · DOI
- Schrepp, M, A.Hiderks & J. Thomaschewski, 2017, "Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)," International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 40-44.
- S. Putro, K. Kusrini, and M. P. Kurniawan, 2020, "Penerapan Metode UEQ dan Cooperative Evaluation untuk Mengevaluasi User Experience Lapor Bantul," Creat. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 27, doi: 10.24076/citec.2019v6i1.242. · DOI
- I. N. S. W. Wijaya, P. P. Santika, I. B. A. I. Iswara, and I. N. A. Arsana, 2021, "Analisis dan Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna PaTik Bali dengan Metode User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)," J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 217, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2020762763. · DOI
Cited by
Umar, R., & Ahnafi, M. G. (2025) · Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.31603/itej.13957 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratama, A., Faroqi, A., & Mandyartha, E. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur (ID)
- Venue
- Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
- Published
- 2022-11-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1019-1029
- ISSN
- 2656-4882 (ISSN-L)
- 2656-5935
- OpenAlex
- W4311161305
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- user experience evaluation, User Experience Questionnaire, educational information systems, student perceptions, system efficiency, system dependability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of User Experience in Integrated Learning Information Systems Using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.51519/journalisi.v4i4.394
- The paper
- Pratama, A., Faroqi, A., & Mandyartha, E. P. (2022). Evaluation of User Experience in Integrated Learning Information Systems Using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Journal of Information Systems and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v4i4.394
