Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 114Focus Groups and Qualitative MethodsSurvey Methodology and NonresponseQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The Internet Matters: Exploring the Use of the Internet as a Research Tool

Illingworth, Nicola·2001·Sociological Research Online

Abstract

The arrival of the virtual realm and computer mediated communication (CMC) continues to attract considerable interest from a wide range of disciplines. Hine (2000) has suggested that previously negative understandings of CMC have been transcended. The virtual realm is now welcomed as a site for richer and more sustained interaction than previously envisaged. For the research community, the rapid development of the World Wide Web has opened new horizons and provided access to a new frontier and tool for data collection. The researcher can now engage in research on a world-wide, low cost, almost instantaneous scale - and in ways which potentially overcome some of the barriers imposed by more conventional research approaches. However, this somewhat idealistic view obscures both methodological and ethical difficulties that have become apparent throughout this research. If these difficulties are left unchecked, they may serve to undermine the use of the Internet as a tool for social research. The primary aim of this paper is to expose these difficulties and thus broaden the scope of discourse surrounding the Internet. A secondary aim is to explore the implications of the use of the Internet for the feminist methodological and research project. My aim here is to problematise the transference of existing methodological frameworks to an online setting. In this respect, I have presented this paper in the form of a research trajectory, outlining the course of my research from its conce…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5153/sro.600

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 114

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. BROMBERG H, 1996, Cultures of Internet. Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies.
  2. 10.4324/9780203418161 · DOI
  3. 10.5153/sro.308 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1986.tb00073.x · DOI
  5. 10.5153/sro.73 · DOI
  6. COREA G, 1985, Man-Made Women: How new reproductive technologies affect women
  7. GIMENEZM.E. (1991) ‘The Mode of Reproduction in Transition - A Marxist-Feminist Analysis of the Effects of Reproductive Technologies’ http://csf.colorado.edu/authors/Gimenez.Martha/nrts.html · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0038038594028001018 · DOI
  9. HARAWAY D, 1991, Symians, Cyborgs and Women
  10. HARCOURT W., 1999, Women @ internet. Creating new cultures in cyberspace
  11. HARDING S, 1986, The Science Question in Feminism
  12. 10.4135/9780857020277 · DOI
  13. HOLMES D., 1997, Virtual Politics. Identity and Community in Cyberspace
  14. HOOD S, 1999, Critical Issues in Social Research: Power and Prejudice
  15. ILLINGWORTH N.A., 2000, ‘Motherhood Meets Science: Salvation or the Enemy? An Analysis of the feminist critique of Assisted Reproductive Technologies’.
  16. JONES S.G., 1995, Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community
  17. JONES S.G., 1997, Virtual Culture: identity and communication in cybersociety
  18. JONES S.G., 1999, Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, 10.4135/9781452231471 · DOI
  19. 10.4135/9781452231471.n3 · DOI
  20. KVALE S, 1996, Inter-Views: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing
  21. 10.4135/9781849209281 · DOI
  22. MAYNARD M, 1998, Knowing the Social World
  23. NGUYEN D. T., 1996, Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies
  24. OAKLEY A, 1981, Doing Feminist Research
  25. OAKLEY A, 1993, Essays on women, medicine and health
  26. 10.1177/0038038598032004005 · DOI
  27. 10.5153/sro.543 · DOI
  28. 10.1057/fr.1992.5 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0038038589023003006 · DOI
  30. RENZETTI C.M., 1993, Researching Sensitive Topics
  31. ROSE H, 1987, Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine
  32. SELWYN N, 1998, Social Research Update
  33. 10.4135/9781452231471.n12 · DOI
  34. SMART C, 1992, Regulating Womanhood
  35. SMITH D, 1988, The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology
  36. SPENDER D, 1995, Nattering on the Net. Women, Power and Cyberspace.
  37. SPROULL L.S., 1996, Academy of Management Journal, 29, 10.2307/255867 · DOI
  38. STANLEY L, 1990, Feminist Praxis
  39. STANWORTH M., 1987, Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine
  40. STEWART C. M., 1999, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century
  41. 10.4135/9781452231471.n2 · DOI
  42. TURKLE S, 1985, Comparative Education, 32, 217
  43. TURKLE S, 1995, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
  44. WACJMAN J, 1991, Feminism Confronts Technology

Metadata

Authors
Illingworth, N.
Corresponding author
Illingworth, Nicola
Venue
Sociological Research Online
Published
2001-08
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
79-90
ISSN
1360-7804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076926684
Cited by
114
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociological Research Online (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • epress (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
online research, computer-mediated communication, online data collection, feminist methodology, research ethics, methodological issues, World Wide Web, virtual communication, research trajectories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Internet Matters: Exploring the Use of the Internet as a Research Tool. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5153/sro.600
The paper
Illingworth, N. (2001). The Internet Matters: Exploring the Use of the Internet as a Research Tool. Sociological Research Online. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.600

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.