Cited by 24Ethics and Social Impacts of AIImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Ethical considerations in AI use for SMEs and supply chains: Current challenges and future directions

Open access
Angela Omozele Abhulimen, Onyinye Gift Ejike·2024·International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and supply chains has revolutionized operational efficiencies and decision-making processes. This review paper aims to explore the ethical implications of AI adoption in these sectors, identifying current challenges and proposing future directions for ethical AI deployment. Through an extensive review of existing literature, the paper examines key ethical concerns such as data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, transparency, and the socio-economic impact on the workforce. The findings indicate that SMEs face unique ethical challenges due to their limited resources and expertise, which exacerbate issues related to AI implementation. Additionally, supply chains grapple with transparency and accountability, necessitating immediate attention to ensure ethical practices. The review concludes that establishing a robust ethical framework is crucial for guiding AI integration in SMEs and supply chains. It recommends the development of standardized ethical guidelines, enhanced stakeholder engagement, and increased investment in AI literacy and infrastructure. Future research should focus on creating adaptable ethical models that evolve alongside technological advancements and industry needs, ensuring that AI contributes to sustainable and equitable growth. This paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on ethical AI, offering actionable insights for policymakers, business leaders, and researcher…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1391

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 24

Metadata

Authors
Abhulimen, A. O., & Ejike, O. G.
Venue
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences
Published
2024-08-11
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
1653-1679
ISSN
  • 2706-9176 (ISSN-L)
  • 2706-9184
OpenAlex
W4401495774
Cited by
24
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
ethical AI, small and medium-sized enterprises, supply chain, algorithmic bias, data privacy, transparency, accountability, trust in AI, job displacement, explainable AI, retraining, AI ethics framework, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, regulatory compliance, responsible AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review