Root Mean Square Layer Normalization
Open accessAbstract
Layer normalization (LayerNorm) has been successfully applied to various deep neural networks to help stabilize training and boost model convergence because of its capability in handling re-centering and re-scaling of both inputs and weight matrix. However, the computational overhead introduced by LayerNorm makes these improvements expensive and significantly slows the underlying network, e.g. RNN in particular. In this paper, we hypothesize that re-centering invariance in LayerNorm is dispensable and propose root mean square layer normalization, or RMSNorm. RMSNorm regularizes the summed inputs to a neuron in one layer according to root mean square (RMS), giving the model re-scaling invariance property and implicit learning rate adaptation ability. RMSNorm is computationally simpler and thus more efficient than LayerNorm. We also present partial RMSNorm, or pRMSNorm where the RMS is estimated from p% of the summed inputs without breaking the above properties. Extensive experiments on several tasks using diverse network architectures show that RMSNorm achieves comparable performance against LayerNorm but reduces the running time by 7%~64% on different models. Source code is available at https://github.com/bzhangGo/rmsnorm.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 203
- Authors
- Zhang, B., & Sennrich, R.
- Affiliations
- Xiamen University (CN)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Curran Associates
- Publisher
- Curran Associates
- Published
- 2019-12-14
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 12360-12371
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970903692
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- neural information processing systems
- Funders
- Baidu
- European Commission (H2020-ICT, H2020, 825460)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P020259/1, EP/P020259, H2020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- RMSNorm, layer normalization, computational efficiency, training stability, recurrent neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review