The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., & Barabási, A.-L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610245104 · Cited by 1,926
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
A Survey on Performance Metrics for Object-Detection Algorithms
Padilla, R., Netto, S. L., & da Silva, E. A. B. (2020) · 2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP) · doi:10.1109/iwssip48289.2020.9145130 · Cited by 1,605
Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science
Gawad, C., Koh, W., & Quake, S. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.16 · Cited by 1,334
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaccard, P.
- Venue
- E-Periodica
- Published
- 1901-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Pages
- 547-579
- OpenAlex
- W2745750801
- Cited by
- 2,353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5169/seals-266450
- The paper
- Jaccard, P. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. E-Periodica. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-266450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
