Mother/daughter intergenerational interviews: Insights into qualitative interviewing
Abstract
As part of a larger study examining the social history of the Well Child/Health and Development Record Book in New Zealand, mother-daughter intergenerational dyad interviews were undertaken. The inter-generational dyad interviews were utilised to explore why mothers often keep their children's Well Child/Health and Development Record Books (Plunket Books) well beyond the five years of age that the Well Child Nurse stops visiting. Mother-daughter intergenerational dyad interviews are not a commonly used method of interview but can elicit valuable information that may otherwise be overlooked. This article discusses the method with which the interviews were undertaken and argues that successful construction of mother/daughter intergenerational dyad interviews is the result of a combination of context and the resulting interaction between the mother, daughter and interviewer/researcher.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The research process is reciprocal, as Clendon explains in her work with mother/daughter dyads using a participatory interview style.
“It was a reciprocal process, as Clendon (2007) explains in her work with mother/daughter dyads where she used a participatory interview style with participants, sharing information about herself with them.”
From Moving beyond ‘shopping list’ positionality: Using kitchen table reflexivity and in/visible tools to develop reflexive qualitative research (2023) · cites this paper as Clendon (2007)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Folkes, L. (2023) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941221098922 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clendon, J.
- Affiliations
- Massey University (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Clendon, Jill
- ORCID
- Clendon, Jill
- Venue
- Contemporary Nurse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-251
- ISSN
- 1037-6178 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-3535
- OpenAlex
- W2091136690
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Nurse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
- Keywords
- child health records, mother-daughter relationships, child health history, New Zealand
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Mothers, New Zealand, Nuclear Family, Intergenerational Relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review