CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIFreedom of Expression and Defamation

Transparencia algorítmica en los medios de comunicación y las plataformas digitales

Open access
Pauner Chulvi, Cristina·2023·Revista Española de la Transparencia
DOI 10.51915/ret.308
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

La transparencia algorítmica ha cobrado especial relevancia en el contexto de la información y la comunicación porque la utilización de algoritmos en medios de comunicación y plataformas está absolutamente extendida e integrada en todos sus aspectos. La falta de transparencia sobre el uso de estas herramientas matemáticas unida a las características intrínsecas de los algoritmos ha provocado efectos negativos en el contexto del periodismo como la dificultad de cumplir con su función de perro guardián y de las plataformas contribuyendo a la difusión de desinformación, la censura de contenidos o la explotación ilegal de datos. Por ello, las disposiciones que está adoptando la Unión Europea en materia de transparencia algorítmica constituyen un avance para mitigar los riesgos de la manipulación informativa y garantizar los derechos de los usuarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51915/ret.308

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. BLUMLER, J. G. 2018. "The Crisis of Public Communication, 1995-2017". Javnost-The Public, vol. 25, núm. 1-2: 83-92.
  2. CARLSON, M. 2014. "The robotic reporter: automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms and journalistic authority". Digital Journalism, vol. 3(3): 416-431.
  3. COTINO HUESO, L. -2022. "Transparencia y explicabilidad de la inteligencia artificial y "compañía" (comunicación, interpretabilidad, inteligibilidad, auditabilidad, testabilidad, comprobabilidad, simulabilidad…). Para qué, para quién y cuánta", en Transparencia y explicabilidad de la Inteligencia Artificial. Tirant lo Blanch: Valencia, pp. 25-69.
  4. FLORES-VIVAR, J. M. 2018. «Algoritmos, aplicaciones y Big data, nuevos paradigmas en el proceso de comunicación y de enseñanza-aprendizaje del periodismo de datos». Revista de Comunicación, vol. 17, núm. 2: 268-291.
  5. GARCÍA-GORDILLO, M. M.; PALAU-SAMPIO, D. y RIVAS-DE-ROCA, R. 2022. "Pero ¿qué me cuentas? Una revisión del concepto de verdad en el siglo XXI", en Caro- González, F. J.; Garrido-Lora, M.; García-Gordillo, M. M. (eds.), El problema de la verdad. Retos y riesgos en la comunicación. Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones: Salamanca, pp. 61-81.
  6. HELBERGER, N. & DIAKOPOULOS, N. 2022. "The European AI Act and How It Matters for Research into AI in Media and Journalism". Digital Journalism. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2082505 · DOI
  7. KOVACH, B. & ROSENSTIEL, T. 2001. The elements of journalism. What news people should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press: New York.
  8. KOLISKA, M. 2022. "Trust and journalistic transparency online". Journalism Studies, vol. 23, núm. 12: 1488-1509. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2022.2102532. · DOI
  9. LATAR, N. L. 2015. "The Robotic Journalist in The Age of Social Physics: The End of Human Journalism?", in G. Einav (ed.), The New World of Transition Media. Springer International Publishing: Swiss, pp. 65-80.
  10. MEYER, P. 1975. "Precision journalism". Communication Information, vol. 1, núm. 1: 164- 165.
  11. PARISER, E. 2011. The filter buble. What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press. London.
  12. SALAVERRÍA, R. -2019. "Digital journalism: 25 years of research. Review article". El profesional de la información, vol. 28, núm. 1. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.01. -2014. "Periodismo en 2014: balance y tendencia". Cuaderno de Periodistas, núm. 29: 9-22. · DOI
  13. STRÖMBACK, J. 2005. "In Search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism". Journalism Studies, vol. 6:3: 331- 345, DOI: 10.1080/14616700500131950 · DOI
  14. -2018. "Uso de bots y algoritmos para automatizar la redacción de noticias: percepción y actitudes de los periodistas en España". El Profesional de la Información, vol. 27, núm. 4: 1699-2407.
  15. VAN DALEN, A. 2012. "The algorithms behind the headlines". Journalism Practice, vol. 6, issue 5-6: 648-658, DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2012.667268. · DOI
  16. WÖLKER, A. & POWELL, T. E. 2018. "Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers'perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism". Journalism, vol. 22, issue 1: 86-103, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pauner Chulvi, C.
Venue
Revista Española de la Transparencia
Publisher
Revista Espanola de la Transparencia, ACREDITRA
Published
2023-07-24
Issue
17 Extra
Pages
107-136
ISSN
2444-2607 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.51915/ret.308
OpenAlex
W4385196889
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
12.65
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Revista Española de la Transparencia (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Keywords
algorithmic transparency, digital platforms, disinformation, content censorship, data exploitation, information manipulation, user rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review