The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atmospheric dust modeling from meso to global scales with the online NMMB/BSC-Dust model – Part 1: Model description, annual simulations and evaluation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. We describe and evaluate the NMMB/BSC-Dust, a new dust aerosol cycle model embedded online within the NCEP Non-hydrostatic Multiscale Model (NMMB). NMMB is a further evolution of the operational Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (WRF-NMM), which together with other upgrades has been extended from meso to global scales. Its unified non-hydrostatic dynamical core is prepared for regional and global simulation domains. The new NMMB/BSC-Dust is intended to provide short to medium-range weather and dust forecasts from regional to global scales and represents a first step towards the development of a unified chemical-weather model. This paper describes the parameterizations used in the model to simulate the dust cycle including sources, transport, deposition and interaction with radiation. We evaluate monthly and annual means of the global configuration of the model against the AEROCOM dust benchmark dataset for year 2000 including surface concentration, deposition and aerosol optical depth (AOD), and we evaluate the daily AOD variability in a regional domain at high resolution covering Northern Africa, Middle East and Europe against AERONET AOD for year 2006. The NMMB/BSC-Dust provides a good description of the horizontal distribution and temporal variability of the dust. Daily AOD correlations at the regional scale are around 0.6–0.7 on average without dust data assimilation. At the global scale the model lies within the top range of AEROCOM dust models in terms of performance statistics for surface concentration, deposition and AOD. This paper discusses the current strengths and limitations of the modeling system and points towards future improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., & Clough, S. A. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97jd00237 · Cited by 8,419
AERONET—A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., et al. (1998) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00031-5 · Cited by 7,743
Janjić, Z. I. (1994) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:tsmecm>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,366
The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes
Bagnold, R. A. (1971) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5682-7 · Cited by 3,249
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V., Gayno, G., & Tarpley, J. D. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd003296 · Cited by 3,163
Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., & Gill, T. E. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2000rg000095 · Cited by 2,977
Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate
Jickells, T. D., An, Z. S., Andersen, K. K., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Cao, J. J., Boyd, P. W., Duce, R. A., Hunter, K. A., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105959 · Cited by 2,881
Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., & Lin, S. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd000053 · Cited by 2,167
Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Eck, T. F., & Slutsker, I. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900040 · Cited by 1,807
A Parameterization for the Absorption of Solar Radiation in the Earth's Atmosphere
Lacis, A. A., & Hansen, J. (1974) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0118:apftao>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,500
Cited by
The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 Onward. Part II: Evaluation and Case Studies
Buchard, V., Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A., Colarco, P. R., Govindaraju, R., Ferrare, R., Hair, J., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., et al. (2017) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-16-0613.1 · Cited by 912
Vogel, A., Alessa, G., Scheele, R., Weber, L., Dubovik, O., North, P., & Fiedler, S. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035483 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez, C., Haustein, K., Janjic, Z., Jorba, O., Huneeus, N., Baldasano, J. M., Black, T., Basart, S., Nickovic, S., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J. P., Schulz, M., & Thomson, M.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2011-12-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13001-13027
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2006602431
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric dust modeling from meso to global scales with the online NMMB/BSC-Dust model – Part 1: Model description, annual simulations and evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011
- The paper
- Pérez, C., Haustein, K., Janjic, Z., Jorba, O., Huneeus, N., Baldasano, J. M., Black, T., Basart, S., Nickovic, S., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J. P., Schulz, M., & Thomson, M. (2011). Atmospheric dust modeling from meso to global scales with the online NMMB/BSC-Dust model – Part 1: Model description, annual simulations and evaluation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13001-2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
