Cited by 97Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

The fluorescence properties of aerosol larger than 0.8 μm in urban and tropical rainforest locations

Open access
Gabey, A. M., Stanley, W. R., Gallagher, M. W., Kaye, P. H.·2011·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. UV-LIF measurements were performed on ambient aerosol in Manchester, UK (urban city centre, winter) and Borneo, Malaysia (remote, tropical) using a Wide Issue Bioaerosol Spectrometer, version 3 (WIBS3). These sites are taken to represent environments with minor and significant primary biological aerosol (PBA) influences respectively, and the urban dataset describes the fluorescent background aerosol against which PBA must be identified by researchers using LIF. The ensemble aerosol at both sites was characterised over 2–3 weeks by measuring the fluorescence intensity and optical equivalent diameter (DP) of single particles sized 0.8 ≤ DP ≤ 20 μm. Filter samples were also collected for a subset of the Manchester campaign and analysed using energy dispersive X-Ray (EDX) spectroscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), which revealed mostly non-PBA at D ≤ 1 μm. The WIBS3 features three fluorescence channels: the emission following a 280 nm excitation is recorded at 310–400 nm (channel F1) and 400–600 nm (F2), and fluorescence excited at 350 nm is detected at 400–600 nm (F3). In Manchester the primary size mode of fluorescent and non-fluorescent material was present at 0.8–1.2 μm, with a secondary fluorescent mode at 2–4 μm. In Borneo non-fluorescent material peaked at 0.8–1.2 μm and fluorescent at 3–4 μm. Agreement between fluorescent number concentrations in each channel differed at the two sites, with F1 and F3 reporting similar concentrations in Borneo but F3 outnumbering F1 by a factor of 2–3 across the size spectrum in Manchester. The fluorescence intensity in each channel generally rose with DP at both sites with the exception of F1 intensity in Manchester, which peaked at DP = 4 μm, causing a divergence between F1 and F3 intensity at larger DP. This divergence and the differing fluorescent particle concentrations demonstrate the additional discrimination provided by the F1 channel in Manchester. The relationships between fluorescence intensities in different pairs of channels were also investigated as a function of DP. Differences between these metrics were apparent at each site and provide some distinction between the two datasets. Finally, particle selection criteria based on the Borneo dataset were applied to identify a median concentration of 10 "Borneo-like" fluorescent particles per litre in Manchester.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-11-5491-2011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in number concentration towards small particles has been reported for some FBAP measurement series, although only a small fraction of FBAP could be identified as bacteria cells.

    “Contrary to that, an increase in number concentration towards small particles has been reported for some FBAP measurement series, although only a small fraction of FBAP could be identified as bacteria cells (Gabey et al., 2011; Huffman et al., 2010).”

    From Regional-scale simulations of fungal spore aerosols using an emission parameterization adapted to local measurements of fluorescent biological aerosol particles (2015) · cites this paper as Gabey et al., 2011

    Section 3.1.4 (page not specified) reports that fluorescent particles in Manchester had a primary size mode at 0.8–1.2 µm, supporting the small-particle part of the claim. But the paper does not establish what fraction of fluorescent particles were bacterial cells: Section 4 says it could not rule out either biological particles or false positives as the dominant fluorescent component in Manchester. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Elbert, W., Taylor, P. E., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Contribu- tion of fungi to primary biogenic aerosols in the atmosphere: wet and dry discharged spores, carbohydrates, and inorganic ions, At- mos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4569-4588, doi:10.5194/acp-7-4569-2007, 2007. · DOI
  2. Gabey, A. M., Gallagher, M. W., Whitehead, J., Dorsey, J. R., Kaye, P. H., and Stanley, W. R.: Measurements and comparison of pri- mary biological aerosol above and below a tropical forest canopy using a dual channel fluorescence spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4453-4466, doi:10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hewitt, C. N., Lee, J. D., MacKenzie, A. R., Barkley, M. P., Carslaw, N., Carver, G. D., Chappell, N. A., Coe, H., Col- lier, C., Commane, R., Davies, F., Davison, B., DiCarlo, P., Di Marco, C. F., Dorsey, J. R., Edwards, P. M., Evans, M. J., Fowler, D., Furneaux, K. L., Gallagher, M., Guenther, A., Heard, D. E., Helfter, C., Hopkins, J., Ingham, T., Irwin, M., Jones, C., Karunaharan, A., Langford, B., Lewis, A. C., Lim, S. F., MacDonald, S. M., Mahajan, A. S., Malpass, S., McFiggans, G., Mills, G., Misztal, P., Moller, S., Monks, P. S., Nemitz, E., Nicolas-Perea, V., Oetjen, H., Oram, D. E., Palmer, P. I., Phillips, G. J., Pike, R., Plane, J. M. C., Pugh, T., Pyle, J. A., Reeves, C. E., Robinson, N. H., Stewart, D., Stone, D., Whalley, L. K., and Yin, X.: Overview: oxidant and particle photochem- ical processes above a south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): introduction, rationale, location characteristics and tools, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 169-199, doi:10.5194/acp-10- 169-2010, 2010. · DOI
  4. Huffman, J. A., Treutlein, B., and Pöschl, U.: Fluorescent bi- ological aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions measured with an Ultraviolet Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (UV- APS) in Central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3215-3233, doi:10.5194/acp-10-3215-2010, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lakowicz, J. R.: Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 3rd Edi- tion, Springer, New York, 2006.
  6. Pan, Y.-L., Pinnick, R. G., Hill, S. C., Rosen, J. M., and Chang, R. K.: Single-particle laser-induced-fluorescence spec- tra of biological and other organic-carbon aerosols in the at- mosphere: Measurements at New Haven, Connecticut, and Las Cruces, New Mexico, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S19, doi:10.1029/2007JD008741, 2007. · DOI
  7. Pöschl, U., Martin, S. T., Sinha, B., Chen, Q., Gunthe, S. S., Huffman, J. A., Borrmann, S., Farmer, D. K., Garland, R. M., Helas, G., Jimenez, J. L., King, S. M., Manzi, A., Mikhailov, E., Pauliquevis, T., Petters, M. D., Prenni, A. J., Roldin, P., Rose, D., Schneider, J., Su, H., Zorn, S. R., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Rainforest Aerosols as Biogenic Nuclei of Clouds and Precipitation in the Amazon, Science, 329, 1513- 1516, doi:10.1126/science.1191056, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Westphal, A. J., Price, P. B., Leighton, T. J., and Wheeler, K. E.: Ki- netics of size changes of individual Bacillus thuringiensis spores in response to changes in relative humidity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 3461-3466, doi:10.1073/pnas.232710999, 2003. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabey, A. M., Stanley, W. R., Gallagher, M. W., & Kaye, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2011-06-15
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
5491-5504
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W1989512411
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/E011217/1, NE/D004624/1, NE/E011136/1, NE/E011233/1, NE/H002316/1, NE/H00324X/1, NE/E009565/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
bioaerosols, light-induced fluorescence, urban aerosols, particle size distribution, fluorescence intensity, Manchester, Borneo, aerosol chemical composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review