The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characteristics of atmospheric ammonia over Beijing, China
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Continuous measurements of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) were conducted using Ogawa passive samplers from February 2008 to July 2010 at an urban site and from January 2007 to July 2010 at a rural site in Beijing, China. NH4+ in fine particles was also collected at the rural site during 2008–2009. The field comparison between the Ogawa passive samplers and an active analyzer for NH3 conducted at the urban site assures the quality and accuracy of the measurements. The concentrations of NH3 at the urban site ranged from 0.7 to 85.1 ppb, with the annual average of 18.5 ± 13.8 and 23.5 ± 18.0 ppb in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The NH3 concentrations at the rural site were lower than those at urban site, and varied from 0.8 to 42.9 ppb, with the annual average of 4.5 ± 4.6, 6.6 ± 7.0 and 7.1 ± 3.5 ppb in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The data showed marked seasonal variations at both sites. The results emphasized traffic to be a significant source of NH3 concentrations in winter in urban areas of Beijing. This was illustrated by the strong correlations of NH3 with the traffic related pollutants (NOx and CO) and also by the bimodal diurnal cycle of NH3 concentrations that was synchronized with traffic. Similar patterns were not observed during the summer, suggesting other non-traffic sources became more important. At the rural site, the daily NH4+ concentrations ranged from 0.10 to 36.53 μg m−3, with an average of 7.03 μg m−3 from June 2008 to December 2009. Monthly NH3 were significantly correlated with NH4+ concentrations. Average monthly NH3/NH4+ ratios varied from 0.13 to 2.28, with an average of 0.73. NH4+ in PM2.5 was primarily associated with SO4−2 at the rural site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China
Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601530 · Cited by 1,317
Severe haze in northern China: A synergy of anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes
An, Z., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, R., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Zhou, W., Shi, Z., Han, Y., Gu, Z., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900125116 · Cited by 1,015
Pan, Y., Tian, S., Liu, D., Fang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Michalski, G., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00634 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFine particle pH during severe haze episodes in northern China
Liu, M., Song, Y., Zhou, T., Xu, Z., Yan, C., Zheng, M., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Wu, Y., & Zhu, T. (2017) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2017gl073210 · Cited by 308
Liu, P., Ye, C., Xue, C., Zhang, C., Mu, Y., & Sun, X. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-4153-2020 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Meng, Z. Y., Lin, W. L., Jiang, X. M., Yan, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. M., Jia, X. F., & Yu, X. L.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2011-06-29
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6139-6151
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2157788523
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of atmospheric ammonia over Beijing, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-11-6139-2011
- The paper
- Meng, Z. Y., Lin, W. L., Jiang, X. M., Yan, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. M., Jia, X. F., & Yu, X. L. (2011). Characteristics of atmospheric ammonia over Beijing, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6139-2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.