The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PM 2.5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Daily PM2.5 (aerosol particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 μm) samples were collected at an urban site in Chengdu, an inland megacity in southwest China, during four 1-month periods in 2011, with each period in a different season. Samples were subject to chemical analysis for various chemical components ranging from major water-soluble ions, organic carbon (OC), element carbon (EC), trace elements to biomass burning tracers, anhydrosugar levoglucosan (LG), and mannosan (MN). Two models, the ISORROPIA II thermodynamic equilibrium model and the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, were applied to explore the likely chemical forms of ionic constituents and to apportion sources for PM2.5. Distinctive seasonal patterns of PM2.5 and associated main chemical components were identified and could be explained by varying emission sources and meteorological conditions. PM2.5 showed a typical seasonality of waxing in winter and waning in summer, with an annual mean of 119 μg m−3. Mineral soil concentrations increased in spring, whereas biomass burning species elevated in autumn and winter. Six major source factors were identified to have contributed to PM2.5 using the PMF model. These were secondary inorganic aerosols, coal combustion, biomass burning, iron and steel manufacturing, Mo-related industries, and soil dust, and they contributed 37 ± 18, 20 ± 12, 11 ± 10, 11 ± 9, 11 ± 9, and 10 ± 12%, respectively, to PM2.5 masses on annual average, while exhibiting large seasonal variability. On annual average, the unknown emission sources that were not identified by the PMF model contributed 1 ± 11% to the measured PM2.5 mass. Various chemical tracers were used for validating PMF performance. Antimony (Sb) was suggested to be a suitable tracer of coal combustion in Chengdu. Results of LG and MN helped constrain the biomass burning sources, with wood burning dominating in winter and agricultural waste burning dominating in autumn. Excessive Fe (Ex-Fe), defined as the excessive portion in measured Fe that cannot be sustained by mineral dust, is corroborated to be a straightforward useful tracer of iron and steel manufacturing pollution. In Chengdu, Mo / Ni mass ratios were persistently higher than unity, and considerably distinct from those usually observed in ambient airs. V / Ni ratios averaged only 0.7. Results revealed that heavy oil fuel combustion should not be a vital anthropogenic source, and additional anthropogenic sources for Mo are yet to be identified. Overall, the emission sources identified in Chengdu could be dominated by local sources located in the vicinity of Sichuan, a result different from those found in Beijing and Shanghai, wherein cross-boundary transport is significant in contributing pronounced PM2.5. These results provided implications for PM2.5 control strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect
Pope, C. A., & Dockery, D. W. (2006) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485 · Cited by 6,583
The composition of the continental crust
Hans Wedepohl, K. (1995) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00038-2 · Cited by 6,345
Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning
Andreae, M. O., & Merlet, P. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001382 · Cited by 3,902
The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation
Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A., Martins, J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R. G., et al. (2005) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas3385.1 · Cited by 3,122
Turpin, B. J., & Lim, H.-J. (2001) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820119445 · Cited by 2,036
Fountoukis, C., & Nenes, A. (2007) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007 · Cited by 1,800
Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols
Andreae, M. O., & Rosenfeld, D. (2008) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001 · Cited by 1,660
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., & Cahill, T. A. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/93jd02916 · Cited by 1,302
Laden, F., Neas, L. M., Dockery, D. W., & Schwartz, J. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108941 · Cited by 1,296
Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM 2.5 in Beijing: seasonal perspective
Zhang, R., Jing, J., Tao, J., Hsu, S.-C., Wang, G., Cao, J., Lee, C. S. L., Zhu, L., Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-7053-2013 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China
Chen, J., Li, C., Ristovski, Z., Milic, A., Gu, Y., Islam, M. S., Wang, S., Hao, J., Zhang, H., He, C., et al. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025 · Cited by 1,262
Review on recent progress in observations, source identifications and countermeasures of PM2.5
Liang, C.-S., Duan, F.-K., He, K.-B., & Ma, Y.-L. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.016 · Cited by 375
An overview of particulate emissions from residential biomass combustion
Vicente, E. D., & Alves, C. A. (2018) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.08.027 · Cited by 339
Almeida, S. M., Manousakas, M., Diapouli, E., Kertesz, Z., Samek, L., Hristova, E., Šega, K., Alvarez, R. P., Belis, C. A., & Eleftheriadis, K. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115199 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing, J., Cao, J., & Hsu, S.-C.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-08-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8679-8699
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2147702610
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PM 2.5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014
- The paper
- Tao, J., Gao, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Che, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, Z., Jing, J., Cao, J., & Hsu, S.-C. (2014). PM 2.5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8679-2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.