Cited by 34Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Simulated 2050 aviation radiative forcing from contrails and aerosols

Open access
Chen, Chih-Chieh, Gettelman, Andrew·2016·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. The radiative forcing from aviation-induced cloudiness is investigated by using the Community Atmosphere Model Version 5 (CAM5) in the present (2006) and the future (through 2050). Global flight distance is projected to increase by a factor of 4 between 2006 and 2050. However, simulated contrail cirrus radiative forcing in 2050 can reach 87 mW m−2, an increase by a factor of 7 from 2006, and thus does not scale linearly with fuel emission mass. This is due to non-uniform regional increase in air traffic and different sensitivities for contrail radiative forcing in different regions. CAM5 simulations indicate that negative radiative forcing induced by the indirect effect of aviation sulfate aerosols on liquid clouds in 2050 can be as large as −160 mW m−2, an increase by a factor of 4 from 2006. As a result, the net 2050 radiative forcing of contrail cirrus and aviation aerosols may have a cooling effect on the planet. Aviation sulfate aerosols emitted at cruise altitude can be transported down to the lower troposphere, increasing the aerosol concentration, thus increasing the cloud drop number concentration and persistence of low-level clouds. Aviation black carbon aerosols produce a negligible net forcing globally in 2006 and 2050 in this model study. Uncertainties in the methodology and the modeling are significant and discussed in detail. Nevertheless, the projected percentage increase in contrail radiative forcing is important for future aviation impacts. In addition, the role of aviation aerosols in the cloud nucleation processes can greatly influence on the simulated radiative forcing from aircraft-induced cloudiness and even change its sign. Future research to confirm these results is necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-16-7317-2016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The surface warming of contrail cirrus is expected to further increase in the future, with some projections suggesting a 3-4-fold increase by the year 2050.

    “The surface warming of contrail cirrus is expected to further increase in the future with some projections suggesting a 3 -4-fold increase by the year 2050 14,15 .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 34

Authors
Chen, C.-C., & Gettelman, A.
Affiliations
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Chih-Chieh
  • Gettelman, Andrew
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2016-06-13
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
7317-7333
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W2411550734
Cited by
34
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
contrail cirrus, black carbon aerosols, aerosol indirect effect, climate change projections, cloud nucleation, CAM5

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review