The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO 2 and NO x emissions in China
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Air quality observations by satellite instruments are global and have a regular temporal resolution, which makes them very useful in studying long-term trends in atmospheric species. To monitor air quality trends in China for the period 2005–2015, we derive SO2 columns and NOx emissions on a provincial level with improved accuracy. To put these trends into perspective they are compared with public data on energy consumption and the environmental policies of China. We distinguish the effect of air quality regulations from economic growth by comparing them relatively to fossil fuel consumption. Pollutant levels, per unit of fossil fuel, are used to assess the effectiveness of air quality regulations. We note that the desulfurization regulations enforced in 2005–2006 only had a significant effect in the years 2008–2009, when a much stricter control of the actual use of the installations began. For national NOx emissions a distinct decreasing trend is only visible from 2012 onwards, but the emission peak year differs from province to province. Unlike SO2, emissions of NOx are highly related to traffic. Furthermore, regulations for NOx emissions are partly decided on a provincial level. The last 3 years show a reduction both in SO2 and NOx emissions per fossil fuel unit, since the authorities have implemented several new environmental regulations. Despite an increasing fossil fuel consumption and a growing transport sector, the effects of air quality policy in China are clearly visible. Without the air quality regulations the concentration of SO2 would be about 2.5 times higher and the NO2 concentrations would be at least 25 % higher than they are today in China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review
Li, M., Liu, H., Geng, G., Hong, C., Liu, F., Song, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Cui, H., Man, H., et al. (2017) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx150 · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationEnhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China
Huang, X., Ding, A., Gao, J., Zheng, B., Zhou, D., Qi, X., Tang, R., Wang, J., Ren, C., Nie, W., et al. (2021) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa137 · Cited by 960
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Gui, K., Zhao, T., & Liao, H. (2019) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019 · Cited by 785
Impact of Coronavirus Outbreak on NO2 Pollution Assessed Using TROPOMI and OMI Observations
Bauwens, M., Compernolle, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J. ‐., van Gent, J., Eskes, H., Levelt, P. F., van der A, R., Veefkind, J. P., Vlietinck, J., et al. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl087978 · Cited by 744
Self-citationFeng, Y., Ning, M., Lei, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, W., & Wang, J. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109603 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q., Mao, H., & Theys, N.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2017-02-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1775-1789
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2409430606
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO 2 and NO x emissions in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017
- The paper
- van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q., Mao, H., & Theys, N. (2017). Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO 2 and NO x emissions in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.