The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observing carbon dioxide emissions over China's cities and industrial areas with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. In order to track progress towards the global climate targets, the parties that signed the Paris Climate Agreement will regularly report their anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions based on energy statistics and CO2 emission factors. Independent evaluation of this self-reporting system is a fast-growing research topic. Here, we study the value of satellite observations of the column CO2 concentrations to estimate CO2 anthropogenic emissions with 5 years of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) retrievals over and around China. With the detailed information of emission source locations and the local wind, we successfully observe CO2 plumes from 46 cities and industrial regions over China and quantify their CO2 emissions from the OCO-2 observations, which add up to a total of 1.3 Gt CO2 yr−1 that accounts for approximately 13 % of mainland China's annual emissions. The number of cities whose emissions are constrained by OCO-2 here is 3 to 10 times larger than in previous studies that only focused on large cities and power plants in different locations around the world. Our satellite-based emission estimates are broadly consistent with the independent values from China's detailed emission inventory MEIC but are more different from those of two widely used global gridded emission datasets (i.e., EDGAR and ODIAC), especially for the emission estimates for the individual cities. These results demonstrate some skill in the satellite-based emission quantification for isolated source clusters with the OCO-2, despite the sparse sampling of this instrument not designed for this purpose. This skill can be improved by future satellite missions that will have a denser spatial sampling of surface emitting areas, which will come soon in the early 2020s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reuter, M., Buchwitz, M., Schneising, O., Krautwurst, S., O'Dell, C. W., Richter, A., Bovensmann, H., & Burrows, J. P. (2019) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-9371-2019 · Cited by 238
Cited by
Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China
Liu, Z., Deng, Z., He, G., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Lin, J., Qi, Y., & Liang, X. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00244-x · Cited by 1,748
Satellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China’s CO 2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic
Zheng, B., Geng, G., Ciais, P., Davis, S. J., Martin, R. V., Meng, J., Wu, N., Chevallier, F., Broquet, G., Boersma, F., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd4998 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Broquet, G., Wang, Y., Lian, J., & Zhao, Y.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2020-07-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 8501-8510
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W3044712602
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observing carbon dioxide emissions over China's cities and industrial areas with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-20-8501-2020
- The paper
- Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Broquet, G., Wang, Y., Lian, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Observing carbon dioxide emissions over China's cities and industrial areas with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8501-2020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.