Cited by 53Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence

Open access
Schneider, Tapio, Leung, L. Ruby, Wills, Robert C. J.·2024·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accelerated progress in climate modeling is urgently needed for proactive and effective climate change adaptation. The central challenge lies in accurately representing processes that are small in scale yet climatically important, such as turbulence and cloud formation. These processes will not be explicitly resolvable for the foreseeable future, necessitating the use of parameterizations. We propose a balanced approach that leverages the strengths of traditional process-based parameterizations and contemporary artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods to model subgrid-scale processes. This strategy employs AI to derive data-driven closure functions from both observational and simulated data, integrated within parameterizations that encode system knowledge and conservation laws. In addition, increasing the resolution to resolve a larger fraction of small-scale processes can aid progress toward improved and interpretable climate predictions outside the observed climate distribution. However, currently feasible horizontal resolutions are limited to O (10 km) because higher resolutions would impede the creation of the ensembles that are needed for model calibration and uncertainty quantification, for sampling atmospheric and oceanic internal variability, and for broadly exploring and quantifying climate risks. By synergizing decades of scientific development with advanced AI techniques, our approach aims to significantly boost the accuracy, interpretability, and trustworthiness of climate predictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results provide strong evidence for the disputed hypothesis that learning to predict short-term weather is an effective way to tune parameterizations for climate.

    “Our results provide strong evidence for the disputed hypothesis37–39 that learning to predict short-term weather is an effective way to tune parameterizations for climate.”

    From Neural general circulation models for weather and climate (2024) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, T., Leung, L. R., & Wills, R. C. J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, United States of America)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Tapio
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2024-06-19
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
7041-7062
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W4399809729
Cited by
53
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 8
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (AGS-1835860)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PCEFP2_203376)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
subgrid-scale processes, parameterization, turbulent flow, cloud formation, model resolution, climate change adaptation, uncertainty quantification, model calibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review