Cited by 161Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateClimate variability and models

AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology

Open access
Grewe, V., Stenke, A.·2008·Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. Climate change is a challenge to society and to cope with requires assessment tools which are suitable to evaluate new technology options with respect to their impact on global climate. Here we present AirClim, a model which comprises a linearisation of atmospheric processes from the emission to radiative forcing, resulting in an estimate in near surface temperature change, which is presumed to be a reasonable indicator for climate change. The model is designed to be applicable to aircraft technology, i.e. the climate agents CO2, H2O, CH4 and O3 (latter two resulting from NOx-emissions) and contrails are taken into account. AirClim combines a number of precalculated atmospheric data with aircraft emission data to obtain the temporal evolution of atmospheric concentration changes, radiative forcing and temperature changes. These precalculated data are derived from 25 steady-state simulations for the year 2050 with the climate-chemistry model E39/C, prescribing normalised emissions of nitrogen oxides and water vapour at various atmospheric regions. The results show that strongest climate impacts (year 2100) from ozone changes occur for emissions in the tropical upper troposphere (60 mW/m2; 80 mK for 1 TgN/year emitted) and from methane changes from emissions in the middle tropical troposphere (−2.7% change in methane lifetime; –30 mK per TgN/year). For short-lived species (e.g. ozone, water vapour, methane) individual perturbation lifetimes are derived depending on the region of emission. A comparison of this linearisation approach with results from a comprehensive climate-chemistry model shows reasonable agreement with respect to concentration changes, radiative forcing, and temperature changes. For example, the total impact of a supersonic fleet on radiative forcing (mainly water vapour) is reproduced within 10%. A wide range of application is demonstrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/acp-8-4621-2008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference between transient and steady-state CH4 for the year 2000 found with TROPOS is smaller than that resulting from the Grewe and Stenke (2008) approach (27% and 35%, respectively).

    “The difference between transient and steady-state CH4 for the year 2000 found with TROPOS is smaller than that resulting from the Grewe and Stenke (2008) approach (Myhre et al., 2011) (27% and 35%, respectively).”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Grewe and Stenke (2008)

  • The present approach is in general agreement with that presented by Grewe and Stenke (2008).

    “The present approach is in general agreement with that presented by Grewe and Stenke (2008), which accounts for CH4 concentrations not being in steady-state with OH changes in the year of simulation.”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Grewe and Stenke (2008)

  • If TROPOS is run with constant background emissions representing the year 2000 in a similar manner using Grewe and Stenke (2008) methodology, the difference between transient and steady-state CH4 for the year 2000 increases from 27% to 31%.

    “Indeed, if TROPOS is run with constant background emissions representing the year 2000 in a similar manner using Grewe and Stenke (2008) methodology, the difference between transient and steady-state CH4 for the year 2000 increases from 27% to 31%.”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Grewe and Stenke (2008)

  • The systematic differences are likely due to the Grewe and Stenke (2008) values being based on a simplified chemistry/climate model (AirClim) and the present TROPOS simulations having a different experimental setup and a full chemical reaction scheme.

    “The systematic differences are likely due to the Grewe and Stenke (2008) values being based on a simplified chemistry/climate model (AirClim) and the present TROPOS simulations having a different experimental setup (all our emissions (surface + aircraft) are time-varying) and a full chemical reaction scheme with explicit calculations performed on time-varying emissions.”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Grewe and Stenke (2008)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 161

Authors
Grewe, V., & Stenke, A.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Published
2008-08-11
Volume
8
Issue
16
Pages
4621-4639
ISSN
  • 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-7324
OpenAlex
W2015298455
Cited by
161
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
aviation emissions, climate impact assessment, radiative forcing, ozone, methane, water vapor, nitrogen oxides, contrails, short-lived climate pollutants, supersonic aircraft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review