Cited by 41Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsHydrology and Drought Analysis

The relationship between the Sahelian and previous 2nd Guinean rainy seasons: a monsoon regulation by soil wetness?

Open access
Philippon, N., Fontaine, B.·2002·Annales Geophysicae

Abstract

Abstract. The correlation of 0.61 found between observed July–September Sahelian rainfall in year 0 and September–November Guinean rainfall in year - 1, led us to explore the statistical relationships between precipitation, soil moisture and near surface Moist Static Energy (MSE) gradients in West Africa. These analyses were performed over successive 30-year periods and specifically, the most recent period between 1968–1998. It is shown from observations, National Centers for Environmental Predictions and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalyses and from the Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP) database, that wet Sahelian rainy seasons are preceded by abnormally wet soils over the Sudan-Guinean belt during northern winter. Such moisture anomalies tend to hold during the dry season, then generate increasing MSE gradients just above the continent by March–April. These gradients have been shown to be of prime importance for monsoon dynamics and associated rainfall.Key words. Hydrology (soil moisture) – Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (climatology)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/angeo-20-575-2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A seasonal correlation between autumn Guinean rainfall and the following summer Sahel rainfall has been found and evaluated by other authors, mainly as the result of soil moisture conditions persistence and developed vegetation interactions.

    “a seasonal correlation between autumn Guinean rainfall and the following summer Sahel rainfall has been found and evaluated by other authors, mainly as the result of the soil moisture conditions persistence and the developed vegetation interactions (Philippon and Fontaine 2002;Fontaine et al. 2002;Douville et al. 2007).”

    From Tropical Atlantic variability modes (1979-2002). Part I: Time-evolving SST modes related to West African rainfall (2008) · cites this paper as Philippon and Fontaine 2002

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ocean is not the only factor explaining WA rainfall variability; land surface processes and the role of soil moisture and vegetation are also crucial factors.

    “the ocean is not the only factor explaining the WA rainfall variability, and the interaction with land surface processes and the role played by soil moisture and vegetation are also crucial factors (Douville 2002;Philippon and Fontaine 2002).”

    From Tropical Atlantic variability modes (1979-2002). Part I: Time-evolving SST modes related to West African rainfall (2008) · cites this paper as Philippon and Fontaine 2002

    The Introduction identifies both sea-surface temperatures and land-surface properties as influences on West African rainfall. The Conclusion says rainfall variability could be partly controlled by land–atmosphere feedback involving soil moisture, while the Discussion says vegetation processes can contribute. The paper therefore supports the importance of land processes, but treats vegetation’s role as a possibility rather than establishing it as a crucial factor. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 41

Authors
Philippon, N., & Fontaine, B.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2002-04-30
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
575-582
ISSN
  • 0992-7689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0576
OpenAlex
W2135383426
Cited by
41
References
20
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annales Geophysicae (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Keywords
soil moisture, precipitation anomalies, West African monsoon, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review