The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biogeochemical controls and isotopic signatures of nitrous oxide production by a marine ammonia-oxidizing bacterium
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a trace gas that contributes to the greenhouse effect and stratospheric ozone depletion. The N2O yield from nitrification (moles N2O-N produced per mole ammonium-N consumed) has been used to estimate marine N2O production rates from measured nitrification rates and global estimates of oceanic export production. However, the N2O yield from nitrification is not constant. Previous culture-based measurements indicate that N2O yield increases as oxygen (O2) concentration decreases and as nitrite (NO2−) concentration increases. Here, we have measured yields of N2O from cultures of the marine β-proteobacterium Nitrosomonas marina C-113a as they grew on low-ammonium (50 μM) media. These yields, which were typically between 4 × 10−4 and 7 × 10−4 for cultures with cell densities between 2 × 102 and 2.1 × 104 cells ml−1, were lower than previous reports for ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. The observed impact of O2 concentration on yield was also smaller than previously reported under all conditions except at high starting cell densities (1.5 × 106 cells ml−1), where 160-fold higher yields were observed at 0.5% O2 (5.1 μM dissolved O2) compared with 20% O2 (203 μM dissolved O2). At lower cell densities (2 × 102 and 2.1 × 104 cells ml−1), cultures grown under 0.5% O2 had yields that were only 1.25- to 1.73-fold higher than cultures grown under 20% O2. Thus, previously reported many-fold increases in N2O yield with dropping O2 could be reproduced only at cell densities that far exceeded those of ammonia oxidizers in the ocean. The presence of excess NO2− (up to 1 mM) in the growth medium also increased N2O yields by an average of 70% to 87% depending on O2 concentration. We made stable isotopic measurements on N2O from these cultures to identify the biochemical mechanisms behind variations in N2O yield. Based on measurements of δ15Nbulk, site preference (SP = δ15Nα−δ15Nβ), and δ18O of N2O (δ18O-N2O), we estimate that nitrifier-denitrification produced between 11% and 26% of N2O from cultures grown under 20% O2 and 43% to 87% under 0.5% O2. We also demonstrate that a positive correlation between SP and δ18O-N2O is expected when nitrifying bacteria produce N2O. A positive relationship between SP and δ18O-N2O has been observed in environmental N2O datasets, but until now, explanations for the observation invoked only denitrification. Such interpretations may overestimate the role of heterotrophic denitrification and underestimate the role of ammonia oxidation in environmental N2O production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
Jansen, E. H., Overpeck, J. T., Briffa, K., Duplessy, J., Joos, F., Masson-Delmotte, Olago, D., Otto‐Bliesner, B. L., Peltier, W. R., Rahmstorf, S., et al. (2007) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 4,574
SOLÓRZANO, L. (1969) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799 · Cited by 3,501
Nonlinear Parameter Estimation
Brubaker, T. A., & O'Keefe, K. R. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50049a796 · Cited by 2,134
Mariotti, A., Germon, J. C., Hubert, P., Kaiser, P., Letolle, R., Tardieux, A., & Tardieux, P. (1981) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02374138 · Cited by 1,735
Casciotti, K. L., Sigman, D. M., Hastings, M. G., Böhlke, J. K., & Hilkert, A. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac020113w · Cited by 1,595
Self-citationNitrogen fixation: Anthropogenic enhancement‐environmental response
Galloway, J. N., Schlesinger, W. H., Levy, H., Michaels, A., & Schnoor, J. L. (1995) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/95gb00158 · Cited by 1,071
Walker, C. B., de la Torre, J. R., Klotz, M. G., Urakawa, H., Pinel, N., Arp, D. J., Brochier-Armanet, C., Chain, P. S. G., Chan, P. P., Gollabgir, A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913533107 · Cited by 925
Treusch, A. H., Leininger, S., Kletzin, A., Schuster, S. C., Klenk, H., & Schleper, C. (2005) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00906.x · Cited by 863
Ignarro, L. J., Fukuto, J. M., Griscavage, J. M., Rogers, N. E., & Byrns, R. E. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.17.8103 · Cited by 856 · cited 1×
“where nitrous acid (HNO2), is the major decomposition product of the second reaction (Ignarro et al., 1993).”
Background
Cited by
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Is wood ash amendment a suitable mitigation strategy for N2O emissions from soil?
Bornø, M. L., Rønn, R., & Ekelund, F. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136581 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Frame, C. H., & Casciotti, K. L.
- Venue
- Biogeosciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2010-09-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2695-2709
- ISSN
- 1726-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1726-4189
- OpenAlex
- W2083165797
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeochemical controls and isotopic signatures of nitrous oxide production by a marine ammonia-oxidizing bacterium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/bg-7-2695-2010
- The paper
- Frame, C. H., & Casciotti, K. L. (2010). Biogeochemical controls and isotopic signatures of nitrous oxide production by a marine ammonia-oxidizing bacterium. Biogeosciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2695-2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.