Recreation impact on establishment of dune building species
Open accessAbstract
Sandy shores serve a multitude of purposes; they protect the inland from flooding, support a high biodiversity, and are recreation hotspots. To what extent these functions can coexist or are mutually exclusive is unclear, especially given increasing stressors such as rising sea levels and urbanization. Knowledge on the trade-offs between these functions is important when designing these areas and nature-based solutions to ensure the desired results. We investigated the effect of recreational pressure on the establishment of two common dune building grass species (Ammophila arenaria and Elytrigia juncea). We conducted a field introduction experiment with seeds and rhizomes of both species along increasing distance to a beach entrance. We established a total of 300 plots, following a randomised block design with 4 factorial treatments (species * type diaspore) and 60 replicates for two beaches on the Dutch barrier Island of Terschelling. Plant material was collected from the wild, using local genetic material. Plant seeds were left in their husk to mimic natural dispersal. Plots were georeferenced by means of Real Time Kinematic and left unmarked to enable undisturbed recreation. Recreation pressure was assessed by counting the number of people at different beach sections, confirming that anthropogenic pressure increased with distance to the beach entrance. Establishment success was monitored by counting the number of emerged seeds and sprouted rhizomes per plot at regular inte…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research focuses on visitors' movement behaviour and spatial distribution, highlighting how visitor presence impacts natural elements like vegetation, bird nesting, and macrofauna, as well as physical attributes like sediment and geomorphology.
“Research also focuses on visitors' movement behaviour and spatial distribution (Sidder et al., 2023), highlighting how the visitors presence impacts natural elements like vegetation (van Rosmalen et al., 2023;Varga, 2023), bird nesting (Burger and Niles, 2013), and macrofauna (Moffett et al., 1998), as well as physical attributes like sediment and geomorphology (Nir et al., 2022).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as van Rosmalen et al., 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bakhshianlamouki, E., Augustijn, E.-W., Brugnach, M., Voinov, A., & Wijnberg, K. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/adc353
- Authors
- van Rosmalen, S., Homberger, J.-M., Riksen, M., & Limpens, J.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Homberger, Jan-Markus
- Riksen, Michel
- Limpens, Juul
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2023-05-15
- OpenAlex
- W4321490914
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
- Keywords
- recreational pressure, Ammophila arenaria, Elytrigia juncea, plant establishment, seed dispersal, rhizome sprouting, beach erosion, sediment burial, nature-based solutions, coastal zone management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review