The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. High-spatial-resolution and long-term climate data are highly desirable for understanding climate-related natural processes. China covers a large area with a low density of weather stations in some (e.g., mountainous) regions. This study describes a 0.5′ (∼ 1 km) dataset of monthly air temperatures at 2 m (minimum, maximum, and mean proxy monthly temperatures, TMPs) and precipitation (PRE) for China in the period of 1901–2017. The dataset was spatially downscaled from the 30′ Climatic Research Unit (CRU) time series dataset with the climatology dataset of WorldClim using delta spatial downscaling and evaluated using observations collected in 1951–2016 by 496 weather stations across China. Prior to downscaling, we evaluated the performances of the WorldClim data with different spatial resolutions and the 30′ original CRU dataset using the observations, revealing that their qualities were overall satisfactory. Specifically, WorldClim data exhibited better performance at higher spatial resolution, while the 30′ original CRU dataset had low biases and high performances. Bicubic, bilinear, and nearest-neighbor interpolation methods employed in downscaling processes were compared, and bilinear interpolation was found to exhibit the best performance to generate the downscaled dataset. Compared with the evaluations of the 30′ original CRU dataset, the mean absolute error of the new dataset (i.e., of the 0.5′ dataset downscaled by bilinear interpolation) decreased by 35.4 %–48.7 % for TMPs and by 25.7 % for PRE. The root-mean-square error decreased by 32.4 %–44.9 % for TMPs and by 25.8 % for PRE. The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients increased by 9.6 %–13.8 % for TMPs and by 31.6 % for PRE, and correlation coefficients increased by 0.2 %–0.4 % for TMPs and by 5.0 % for PRE. The new dataset could provide detailed climatology data and annual trends of all climatic variables across China, and the results could be evaluated well using observations at the station. Although the new dataset was not evaluated before 1950 owing to data unavailability, the quality of the new dataset in the period of 1901–2017 depended on the quality of the original CRU and WorldClim datasets. Therefore, the new dataset was reliable, as the downscaling procedure further improved the quality and spatial resolution of the CRU dataset and was concluded to be useful for investigations related to climate change across China. The dataset presented in this article has been published in the Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3114194 for precipitation (Peng, 2019a) and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3185722 for air temperatures at 2 m (Peng, 2019b) and includes 156 NetCDF files compressed in zip format and one user guidance text file.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas
Fick, S. E., & Hijmans, R. J. (2017) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.5086 · Cited by 16,088
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 1×
“Willmott and Matsuura (2005) recommended MAE as an evaluation criterion for estimations.”
BackgroundUpdated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3 .10 Dataset
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., & Lister, D. H. (2014) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3711 · Cited by 6,094
New, M., Hulme, M., & Jones, P. (1999) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0829:rtcstc>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,795
Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework
Giorgi, F., Jones, C., & Asrar, G. (2009) · Cited by 1,706
Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rudolf, B., Schamm, K., Schneider, U., & Ziese, M. (2013) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-5-71-2013 · Cited by 917
Peng, S., Ding, Y., Wen, Z., Chen, Y., Cao, Y., & Ren, J. (2017) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.129 · Cited by 605
Self-citationSpatial and Seasonal Variations of Air Temperature Lapse Rates in Alpine Regions
Rolland, C. (2003) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<1032:sasvoa>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 519
Extremes of summer climate trigger thousands of thermokarst landslides in a High Arctic environment
Lewkowicz, A. G., & Way, R. G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09314-7 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Forest expansion dominates China’s land carbon sink since 1980
Yu, Z., Ciais, P., Piao, S., Houghton, R. A., Lu, C., Tian, H., Agathokleous, E., Kattel, G. R., Sitch, S., Goll, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32961-2 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, S., Ding, Y., Liu, W., & Li, Z.
- Venue
- Earth System Science Data
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2019-12-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1931-1946
- ISSN
- 1866-3508 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-3516
- OpenAlex
- W2971897573
- Cited by
- 1,739
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 33.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019
- The paper
- Peng, S., Ding, Y., Liu, W., & Li, Z. (2019). 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. Earth System Science Data. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.