Facility-scale inventory of dairy methane emissions in California: implications for mitigation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Dairies emit roughly half of total methane (CH 4 ) emissions in California, generating CH 4 from both enteric fermentation by ruminant gut microbes and anaerobic decomposition of manure. Representation of these emission processes is essential for management and mitigation of CH 4 emissions and is typically done using standardized emission factors applied at large spatial scales (e.g., state level). However, CH 4 -emitting activities and management decisions vary across facilities, and current inventories do not have sufficiently high spatial resolution to capture changes at this scale. Here, we develop a spatially explicit database of dairies in California, with information from operating permits and California-specific reports detailing herd demographics and manure management at the facility scale. We calculated manure management and enteric fermentation CH 4 emissions using two previously published bottom-up approaches and a new farm-specific calculation developed in this work. We also estimate the effect of mitigation strategies – the use of mechanical separators and installation of anaerobic digesters – on CH 4 emissions. We predict that implementation of digesters at the 106 dairies that are existing or planned in California will reduce manure CH 4 emissions from those facilities by an average of 26 % and total state CH 4 emissions by 5 % (or ∼36.5 Gg CH 4 /yr). In addition to serving as a planning tool for mitigation, this database is useful as a prior for atmospheric observation-based emissions estimates, attribution of emissions to a specific facility, and validation of CH 4 emissions reductions from management changes. Raster files of the datasets and associated metadata are available from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics (ORNL DAAC; Marklein and Hopkins, 2020; https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1814).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dairy farms near the EM27/SUN site are a large regional source of CH4 emissions.
“The EM27/SUN's location enabled us to sample transient fire plumes from local and state wildfires but was also located near a large cluster of dairy farms, which are a large regional source of CH 4 emissions (Heerah et al., 2021;Marklein et al., 2021).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Ahn, H. K., Mulbry, W., White, J. W., and Konrad, S. L.: Pile mixing increases greenhouse gas emissions during compost- ing of dairy manure, Bioresource Technol., 102, 2904-2909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.142, 2011. · DOI
- Arndt, C., Leytem, A. B., Hristov, A. N., Zavala-Araiza, D., Cativiela, J. P., Conley, S., Daube, C., Faloona, I., and Herndon, S. C.: Short-term methane emissions from 2 dairy farms in California estimated by different measurement tech- niques and US Environmental Protection Agency inventory methodology: A case study, J. Dairy Sci., 101, 11461-11479, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13881, 2018. · DOI
- Cui, Y. Y., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., Peischl, J., McKeen, S. A., Kim, S.-W., Neuman, J. A., Henze, D. K., Bousserez, N., Fischer, M. L., Jeong, S., Michelsen, H. A., Bambha, R. P., Liu, Z., San- toni, G. W., Daube, B. C., Kort, E. A., Frost, G. J., Ryerson, T. B., Wofsy, S. C., and Trainer, M.: Top-down estimate of methane emissions in California using a mesoscale inverse modeling tech- nique: The San Joaquin Valley, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 3686-3699, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026398, 2017. · DOI
- Dlugokencky, E. J., Nisbet, E. G., Fisher, R., and Lowry, D.: Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dan- gers, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A, 369, 2058-2072, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0341, 2011. · DOI
- Duren, R. M., Thorpe, A. K., Foster, K. T., Rafiq, T., Hopkins, F. M., Yadav, V., Bue, B. D., Thompson, D. R., Conley, S., Colombi, N. K., Frankenberg, C., McCubbin, I. B., Eastwood, M. L., Falk, M., Herner, J. D., Croes, B. E., Green, R. O., and Miller, C. E.: California's methane super-emitters, Nature, 575, 180-184, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1720-3, 2019. · DOI
- Hristov, A. N., Harper, M., Meinen, R., Day, R., Lopes, J., Ott, T., Venkatesh, A., and Randles, C. A.: Discrepancies and Uncer- tainties in Bottom-up Gridded Inventories of Livestock Methane Emissions for the Contiguous United States, Environ. Sci. Tech- nol., 51, 13668-13677, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03332, 2017. · DOI
- IPCC: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inven- tories. Volume 4 -Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management, available at: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/ public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_10_Ch10_Livestock.pdf (last access: 4 March 2021), edited by: Eggleston, H. S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K., IGES, Japan, 2006.
- Jeong, S., Zhao, C., Andrews, A. E., Bianco, L., Wilczak, J. M., and Fischer, M. L.: Seasonal variation of CH 4 emis- sions from central California, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D11306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016896, 2012. · DOI
- Jeong, S., Newman, S., Zhang, J., Andrews, A. E., Bianco, L., Bagley, J., Cui, X., Graven, H., Kim, J., Salameh, P., LaFranchi, B. W., Priest, C., Campos-Pineda, M., Novakovskaia, E., Sloop, C. D., Michelsen, H. A., Bambha, R. P., Weiss, R. F., Keeling, R., and Fischer, M. L.: Estimating methane emissions in California's urban and rural regions using mul- titower observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13031- 13049, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025404, 2016. · DOI
- Lory, J. A., Massey, R. E. and Zulovich, J. M.: An Evalua- tion of the USEPA Calculations of Greenhouse Gas Emis- sions from Anaerobic Lagoons, J. Environ. Qual., 39, 776-778, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0319, 2010. · DOI
- Maasakkers, J. D., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Turner, A. J., Weitz, M., Wirth, T., Hight, C., DeFigueiredo, M., Desai, M., Schmeltz, R., Hockstad, L., Bloom, A. A., Bowman, K. W., Jeong, S., and Fischer, M. L.: Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 13123-13133, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02878, 2016. · DOI
- Marklein, A. R. and Hopkins, F. M.: Dairy Sources of Methane Emissions in California, ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1814, 2020. · DOI
- Meyer, D., Price, P. L., Rossow, H. A., Silva-del-Rio, N., Karle, B. M., Robinson, P. H., DePeters, E. J., and Fadel, J. G.: Survey of dairy housing and manure management practices in California, J. Dairy Sci., 94, 4744-4750, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010- 3761, 2011. · DOI
- Miller, S. M., Wofsy, S. C., Michalak, A. M., Kort, E. A., An- drews, A. E., Biraurd, S. C., Dlugokencky, E. J., Eluszkiewicz, J., and Fischer, M. L.: Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 575, 180-184, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314392110, 2013. · DOI
- Miranda, N. D., Granell, R., Tuomisto, H., and Mcculloch, M. D.: Meta-analysis of methane yields from anaerobic diges- tion of dairy cattle manure, Biomass Bioenerg., 86, 65-75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.012, 2016. · DOI
- NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine): Improving Characterization of Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in the United States, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2018.
- Owen, J. J. and Silver, W. L.: Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management: a review of field-based studies, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 550-565, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12687, 2014. · DOI
- Trousdell, J. F., Conley, S. A., Post, A., and Faloona, I. C.: Ob- serving entrainment mixing, photochemical ozone production, and regional methane emissions by aircraft using a simple mixed-layer framework, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15433-15450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15433-2016, 2016. · DOI
- Wecht, K. J., Jacob, D. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Santoni, G. W., Wofsy, S. C., Parker, R., Bösch, H., and Worden, J.: Spatially resolv- ing methane emissions in California: constraints from the Cal- Nex aircraft campaign and from present (GOSAT, TES) and fu- ture (TROPOMI, geostationary) satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8173-8184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14- 8173-2014, 2014. · DOI
- Wolf, J., Asrar, G. R., and West, T. O.: Revised methane emis- sions factors and spatially distributed annual carbon fluxes for global livestock, Carbon Balance and Management, 12, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0084-y, 2017. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frausto-Vicencio, I., Heerah, S., Meyer, A. G., Parker, H. A., Dubey, M., & Hopkins, F. M. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The EM27/SUN’s location enabled us to sample transient fire plumes from local and state wildfires but was also located near a large cluster of dairy farms, which are a large regional source of CH4 emissions (Heerah et al., 2021; Marklein et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Marklein, A. R., Meyer, D., Fischer, M. L., Jeong, S., Rafiq, T., Carr, M., & Hopkins, F. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marklein, Alison R.
- Hopkins, Francesca M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Earth System Science Data
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2021-03-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1151-1166
- ISSN
- 1866-3508 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-3516
- OpenAlex
- W3080299141
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Earth system science data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Office of the President, University of California (Grant LFR-18-548581, LFR-18-548581)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- enteric fermentation, manure methane, anaerobic digestion, methane mitigation, bottom-up emission estimation, California dairy industry, emission factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review