PreprintCited by 33Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesGroundwater and Watershed AnalysisSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Computing water flow through complex landscapes, Part 3: Fill-Spill-Merge: Flow routing in depression hierarchies

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.5194/esurf-9-105-2021

Abstract

Abstract. Depressions – inwardly-draining regions – are common to many landscapes. When there is sufficient moisture, depressions take the form of lakes and wetlands; otherwise, they may be dry. Hydrological flow models used in geomorphology, hydrology, planetary science, soil and water conservation, and other fields often eliminate depressions through filling or breaching; however, this can produce unrealistic results. Models that retain depressions, on the other hand, are often undesirably expensive to run. In previous work we began to address this by developing a depression hierarchy data structure to capture the full topographic complexity of depressions in a region. Here, we extend this work by presenting a Fill-Spill-Merge algorithm that utilizes our depression hierarchy to rapidly process and distribute runoff. Runoff fills depressions, which then overflow and spill into their neighbors. If both a depression and its neighbor fill, they merge. We provide a detailed explanation of the algorithm as well as results from two sample study areas. In these case studies, the algorithm runs 90–2600× faster (with a 2000–63 000× reduction in compute time) than the commonly-used Jacobi iteration and produces a more accurate output. Complete, well-commented, open-source code is available on Github and Zenodo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/esurf-2020-31

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 33

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, R., Callaghan, K. L., & Wickert, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Barnes, Richard
  • Callaghan, Kerry L.
  • Wickert, Andrew D.
Venue
Earth Surface Dynamics
Published
2020-05-05
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
105-121
ISSN
2196-6311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022615942
Cited by
33
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth Surface Dynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Krell Institute (DE-FG02-97ER25308)
  • Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (ACI-1053575)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3834)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2013-10-27)
  • Division of Earth Sciences (EAR-1903606)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Keywords
flow routing, depression filling, runoff distribution, topographic complexity, computational efficiency, wetlands, lakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review