The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Computing water flow through complex landscapes, Part 3: Fill-Spill-Merge: Flow routing in depression hierarchies
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.5194/esurf-9-105-2021
Abstract
Abstract. Depressions – inwardly-draining regions – are common to many landscapes. When there is sufficient moisture, depressions take the form of lakes and wetlands; otherwise, they may be dry. Hydrological flow models used in geomorphology, hydrology, planetary science, soil and water conservation, and other fields often eliminate depressions through filling or breaching; however, this can produce unrealistic results. Models that retain depressions, on the other hand, are often undesirably expensive to run. In previous work we began to address this by developing a depression hierarchy data structure to capture the full topographic complexity of depressions in a region. Here, we extend this work by presenting a Fill-Spill-Merge algorithm that utilizes our depression hierarchy to rapidly process and distribute runoff. Runoff fills depressions, which then overflow and spill into their neighbors. If both a depression and its neighbor fill, they merge. We provide a detailed explanation of the algorithm as well as results from two sample study areas. In these case studies, the algorithm runs 90–2600× faster (with a 2000–63 000× reduction in compute time) than the commonly-used Jacobi iteration and produces a more accurate output. Complete, well-commented, open-source code is available on Github and Zenodo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, R., Callaghan, K. L., & Wickert, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barnes, Richard
- Callaghan, Kerry L.
- Wickert, Andrew D.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Dynamics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2020-05-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-121
- ISSN
- 2196-6311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022615942
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Earth Surface Dynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Krell Institute (DE-FG02-97ER25308)
- Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (ACI-1053575)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3834)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2013-10-27)
- Division of Earth Sciences (EAR-1903606)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
- Keywords
- flow routing, depression filling, runoff distribution, topographic complexity, computational efficiency, wetlands, lakes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review