The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP)
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Flux footprint models are often used for interpretation of flux tower measurements, to estimate position and size of surface source areas, and the relative contribution of passive scalar sources to measured fluxes. Accurate knowledge of footprints is of crucial importance for any upscaling exercises from single site flux measurements to local or regional scale. Hence, footprint models are ultimately also of considerable importance for improved greenhouse gas budgeting. With increasing numbers of flux towers within large monitoring networks such as FluxNet, ICOS (Integrated Carbon Observation System), NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network), or AmeriFlux, and with increasing temporal range of observations from such towers (of the order of decades) and availability of airborne flux measurements, there has been an increasing demand for reliable footprint estimation. Even though several sophisticated footprint models have been developed in recent years, most are still not suitable for application to long time series, due to their high computational demands. Existing fast footprint models, on the other hand, are based on surface layer theory and hence are of restricted validity for real-case applications. To remedy such shortcomings, we present the two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP), based on a novel scaling approach for the crosswind distribution of the flux footprint and on an improved version of the footprint parameterisation of Kljun et al. (2004b). Compared to the latter, FFP now provides not only the extent but also the width and shape of footprint estimates, and explicit consideration of the effects of the surface roughness length. The footprint parameterisation has been developed and evaluated using simulations of the backward Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion model LPDM-B (Kljun et al., 2002). Like LPDM-B, the parameterisation is valid for a broad range of boundary layer conditions and measurement heights over the entire planetary boundary layer. Thus, it can provide footprint estimates for a wide range of real-case applications. The new footprint parameterisation requires input that can be easily determined from, for example, flux tower measurements or airborne flux data. FFP can be applied to data of long-term monitoring programmes as well as be used for quick footprint estimates in the field, or for designing new sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology
(1988) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8 · Cited by 10,224
Convergence Properties of the Nelder--Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions
Lagarias, J. C., Reeds, J. A., Wright, M. H., & Wright, P. E. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/s1052623496303470 · Cited by 7,447
Diffusion by Continuous Movements
Taylor, G. I. (1922) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms/s2-20.1.196 · Cited by 2,922
Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers
Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A., & Rajagopalan, S. (1991) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.3119492 · Cited by 1,335
Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form
Grimmond, C. S. B., & Oke, T. R. (1999) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1262:apouad>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,261
Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows
Thomson, D. J. (1987) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112087001940 · Cited by 1,216
Air quality model performance evaluation
Chang, J. C., & Hanna, S. R. (2004) · Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics · doi:10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7 · Cited by 1,150
Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height
Seibert, P. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00349-0 · Cited by 1,066
An Analytical Footprint Model For Non-Neutral Stratification
Kormann, R., & Meixner, F. X. (2001) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1023/a:1018991015119 · Cited by 844
Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation
Schuepp, P. H., Leclerc, M. Y., MacPherson, J. I., & Desjardins, R. L. (1990) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/bf00120530 · Cited by 831
Cited by
Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites
Chu, H., Luo, X., Ouyang, Z., Chan, W. S., Dengel, S., Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Metzger, S., Kumar, J., Arain, M. A., et al. (2021) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350 · Cited by 497
You, Y., Staebler, R. M., Moussa, S. G., Beck, J., & Mittermeier, R. L. (2021) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-14-1879-2021 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M. W., & Schmid, H. P.
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2015-11-17
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3695-3713
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W1838347895
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 27.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015
- The paper
- Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M. W., & Schmid, H. P. (2015). A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP). Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.