The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Simulations with a hydrological model for the river Rhine for the present (1960–1989) and a projected future (2070–2099) climate are discussed. The hydrological model (RhineFlow) is driven by meteorological data from a 90-years (ensemble of three 30-years) simulation with the HadRM3H regional climate model for both present-day and future climate (A2 emission scenario). Simulation of present-day discharges is realistic provided that (1) the HadRM3H temperature and precipitation are corrected for biases, and (2) the potential evapotranspiration is derived from temperature only. Different methods are used to simulate discharges for the future climate: one is based on the direct model output of the future climate run (direct approach), while the other is based on perturbation of the present-day HadRM3H time series (delta approach). Both methods predict a similar response in the mean annual discharge, an increase of 30% in winter and a decrease of 40% in summer. However, predictions of extreme flows differ significantly, with increases of 10% in flows with a return period of 100 years in the direct approach and approximately 30% in the delta approach. A bootstrap method is used to estimate the uncertainties related to the sample size (number of years simulated) in predicting changes in extreme flows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State‐of‐the‐art with regional climate models
Rummukainen, M. (2010) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.8 · Cited by 698
Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment
Haasnoot, M., Middelkoop, H., Offermans, A., Beek, E. V., & Deursen, W. P. A. V. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0444-2 · Cited by 339
Bhatta, B., Shrestha, S., Shrestha, P. K., & Talchabhadel, R. (2019) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104082 · Cited by 322
Deutsch, K., Leroy, D., Belpaire, C., den Haan, K. H., Vrana, B., Clayton, H., Hanke, G., Ricci, M., Held, A., Gawlik, B. M., et al. (2014) · DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · doi:10.2779/833200 · Cited by 269
Dhawan, P., Dalla Torre, D., Niazkar, M., Kaffas, K., Larcher, M., Righetti, M., & Menapace, A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40352 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenderink, G., Buishand, A., & van Deursen, W.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2007-05-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1145-1159
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2002340384
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-11-1145-2007
- The paper
- Lenderink, G., Buishand, A., & van Deursen, W. (2007). Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1145-2007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.