The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Streamflow observations from near-natural catchments are of paramount importance for detection and attribution studies, evaluation of large-scale model simulations, and assessment of water management, adaptation and policy options. This study investigates streamflow trends in a newly-assembled, consolidated dataset of near-natural streamflow records from 441 small catchments in 15 countries across Europe. The period 1962–2004 provided the best spatial coverage, but analyses were also carried out for longer time periods (with fewer stations), starting in 1932, 1942 and 1952. Trends were calculated by the slopes of the Kendall-Theil robust line for standardized annual and monthly streamflow, as well as for summer low flow magnitude and timing. A regionally coherent picture of annual streamflow trends emerged, with negative trends in southern and eastern regions, and generally positive trends elsewhere. Trends in monthly streamflow for 1962–2004 elucidated potential causes for these changes, as well as for changes in hydrological regimes across Europe. Positive trends were found in the winter months in most catchments. A marked shift towards negative trends was observed in April, gradually spreading across Europe to reach a maximum extent in August. Low flows have decreased in most regions where the lowest mean monthly flow occurs in summer, but vary for catchments which have flow minima in winter and secondary low flows in summer. The study largely confirms findings from national and regional scale trend analyses, but clearly adds to these by confirming that these tendencies are part of coherent patterns of change, which cover a much larger region. The broad, continental-scale patterns of change are mostly congruent with the hydrological responses expected from future climatic changes, as projected by climate models. The patterns observed could hence provide a valuable benchmark for a number of different studies and model simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau
Sen, P. K. (1968) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 · Cited by 14,517
A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data
Hamed, K. H., & Ramachandra Rao, A. (1998) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00125-x · Cited by 3,897
Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems
Nilsson, C., Reidy, C. A., Dynesius, M., & Revenga, C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1107887 · Cited by 3,509
Bates, B. C., Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Wu, S. (2008) · TaCCIRe Repository (Sokoine University of Agriculture) · Cited by 2,640
A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis
Theil, H. (1992) · Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20 · Cited by 2,517
Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate
Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., & Vecchia, A. V. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04312 · Cited by 2,283
Klein Tank, A. M. G., Wijngaard, J. B., Können, G. P., Böhm, R., Demarée, G., Gocheva, A., Mileta, M., Pashiardis, S., Hejkrlik, L., Kern‐Hansen, C., et al. (2002) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.773 · Cited by 1,738
The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact
(2003) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm134 · Cited by 1,648
A drought climatology for Europe
Lloyd‐Hughes, B., & Saunders, M. A. (2002) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.846 · Cited by 1,199
Sheffield, J., & Wood, E. F. (2008) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0340-z · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment
Hall, J., Arheimer, B., Borga, M., Brázdil, R., Claps, P., Kiss, A., Kjeldsen, T. R., Kriaučiūnienė, J., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lang, M., et al. (2014) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-18-2735-2014 · Cited by 620
Self-citationErosion in Mediterranean landscapes: Changes and future challenges
García-Ruiz, J. M., Nadal-Romero, E., Lana-Renault, N., & Beguería, S. (2013) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.05.023 · Cited by 397
GRUN: an observation-based global gridded runoff dataset from 1902 to 2014
Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I., & Gudmundsson, L. (2019) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-11-1655-2019 · Cited by 386
Elusive drought: uncertainty in observed trends and short- and long-term CMIP5 projections
Orlowsky, B., & Seneviratne, S. I. (2013) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-17-1765-2013 · Cited by 366
Coxon, G., Addor, N., Bloomfield, J. P., Freer, J., Fry, M., Hannaford, J., Howden, N. J. K., Lane, R., Lewis, M., Robinson, E. L., et al. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2459-2020 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J., Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., & Jódar, J.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2367-2382
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2155744142
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 22.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010
- The paper
- Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J., Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., & Jódar, J. (2010). Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.