The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Global flood hazard maps can be used in the assessment of flood risk in a number of different applications, including (re)insurance and large scale flood preparedness. Such global hazard maps can be generated using large scale physically based models of rainfall-runoff and river routing, when used in conjunction with a number of post-processing methods. In this study, the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) land surface model is coupled to ERA-Interim reanalysis meteorological forcing data, and resultant runoff is passed to a river routing algorithm which simulates floodplains and flood flow across the global land area. The global hazard map is based on a 30 yr (1979–2010) simulation period. A Gumbel distribution is fitted to the annual maxima flows to derive a number of flood return periods. The return periods are calculated initially for a 25 × 25 km grid, which is then reprojected onto a 1 × 1 km grid to derive maps of higher resolution and estimate flooded fractional area for the individual 25 × 25 km cells. Several global and regional maps of flood return periods ranging from 2 to 500 yr are presented. The results compare reasonably to a benchmark data set of global flood hazard. The developed methodology can be applied to other datasets on a global or regional scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global drivers of future river flood risk
Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F. P., Bouwman, A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J. C. J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P. L., van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2893 · Cited by 1,151
The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale
Arnell, N. W., & Gosling, S. N. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5 · Cited by 1,121
PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., et al. (2018) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018 · Cited by 667
Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions
Bierkens, M. F. P. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017173 · Cited by 493
Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation
Jongman, B., Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Coughlan de Perez, E., van Aalst, M. K., Kron, W., & Ward, P. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414439112 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Wetterhall, F., & Cloke, H. L.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2012-11-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4143-4156
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2137333775
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-16-4143-2012
- The paper
- Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Wetterhall, F., & Cloke, H. L. (2012). Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4143-2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.