The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated global water mapping based on wide-swath orbital synthetic-aperture radar
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. This paper presents an automated technique which ingests orbital synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imagery and outputs surface water maps in near real time and on a global scale. The service anticipates future open data dissemination of water extent information using the European Space Agency's Sentinel-1 data. The classification methods used are innovative and practical and automatically calibrated to local conditions per 1 × 1° tile. For each tile, a probability distribution function in the range between being covered with water or being dry is established based on a long-term SAR training dataset. These probability distributions are conditional on the backscatter and the incidence angle. In classification mode, the probability of water coverage per pixel of 1 km × 1 km is calculated with the input of the current backscatter – incidence angle combination. The overlap between the probability distributions of a pixel being wet or dry is used as a proxy for the quality of our classification. The service has multiple uses, e.g. for water body dynamics in times of drought or for urgent inundation extent determination during floods. The service generates data systematically: it is not an on-demand service activated only for emergency response, but instead is always up-to-date and available. We validate its use in flood situations using Envisat ASAR information during the 2011 Thailand floods and the Pakistan 2010 floods and perform a first merge with a NASA near real time water product based on MODIS optical satellite imagery. This merge shows good agreement between these independent satellite-based water products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sentinel-1-based flood mapping: a fully automated processing chain
Twele, A., Cao, W., Plank, S., & Martinis, S. (2016) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1192304 · Cited by 629
DeVries, B., Huang, C., Armston, J., Huang, W., Jones, J. W., & Lang, M. W. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111664 · Cited by 518
Development and evaluation of a framework for global flood hazard mapping
Dottori, F., Salamon, P., Bianchi, A., Alfieri, L., Hirpa, F. A., & Feyen, L. (2016) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.05.002 · Cited by 451
Chini, M., Hostache, R., Giustarini, L., & Matgen, P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2737664 · Cited by 334
The Pakistan Flood of August 2022: Causes and Implications
Nanditha, J. S., Kushwaha, A. P., Singh, R., Malik, I., Solanki, H., Chuphal, D. S., Dangar, S., Mahto, S. S., Vegad, U., & Mishra, V. (2023) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003230 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Westerhoff, R. S., Kleuskens, M. P. H., Winsemius, H. C., Huizinga, H. J., Brakenridge, G. R., & Bishop, C.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2013-02-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 651-663
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2119911758
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated global water mapping based on wide-swath orbital synthetic-aperture radar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-17-651-2013
- The paper
- Westerhoff, R. S., Kleuskens, M. P. H., Winsemius, H. C., Huizinga, H. J., Brakenridge, G. R., & Bishop, C. (2013). Automated global water mapping based on wide-swath orbital synthetic-aperture radar. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-651-2013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.