The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall–runoff modelling: towards distributed modelling
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Despite showing great success of applications in many commercial fields, machine learning and data science models generally show limited success in many scientific fields, including hydrology (Karpatne et al., 2017). The approach is often criticized for its lack of interpretability and physical consistency. This has led to the emergence of new modelling paradigms, such as theory-guided data science (TGDS) and physics-informed machine learning. The motivation behind such approaches is to improve the physical meaningfulness of machine learning models by blending existing scientific knowledge with learning algorithms. Following the same principles in our prior work (Chadalawada et al., 2020), a new model induction framework was founded on genetic programming (GP), namely the Machine Learning Rainfall–Runoff Model Induction (ML-RR-MI) toolkit. ML-RR-MI is capable of developing fully fledged lumped conceptual rainfall–runoff models for a watershed of interest using the building blocks of two flexible rainfall–runoff modelling frameworks. In this study, we extend ML-RR-MI towards inducing semi-distributed rainfall–runoff models. The meaningfulness and reliability of hydrological inferences gained from lumped models may tend to deteriorate within large catchments where the spatial heterogeneity of forcing variables and watershed properties is significant. This was the motivation behind developing our machine learning approach for distributed rainfall–runoff modelling titled Machine Induction Knowledge Augmented – System Hydrologique Asiatique (MIKA-SHA). MIKA-SHA captures spatial variabilities and automatically induces rainfall–runoff models for the catchment of interest without any explicit user selections. Currently, MIKA-SHA learns models utilizing the model building components of two flexible modelling frameworks. However, the proposed framework can be coupled with any internally coherent collection of building blocks. MIKA-SHA's model induction capabilities have been tested on the Rappahannock River basin near Fredericksburg, Virginia, USA. MIKA-SHA builds and tests many model configurations using the model building components of the two flexible modelling frameworks and quantitatively identifies the optimal model for the watershed of concern. In this study, MIKA-SHA is utilized to identify two optimal models (one from each flexible modelling framework) to capture the runoff dynamics of the Rappahannock River basin. Both optimal models achieve high-efficiency values in hydrograph predictions (both at catchment and subcatchment outlets) and good visual matches with the observed runoff response of the catchment. Furthermore, the resulting model architectures are compatible with previously reported research findings and fieldwork insights of the watershed and are readily interpretable by hydrologists. MIKA-SHA-induced semi-distributed model performances were compared against existing lumped model performances for the same basin. MIKA-SHA-induced optimal models outperform the lumped models used in this study in terms of efficiency values while benefitting hydrologists with more meaningful hydrological inferences about the runoff dynamics of the Rappahannock River basin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
On inducing equations for vegetation resistance
Baptist, M. J., Babovic, V., Rodríguez Uthurburu, J., Keijzer, M., Uittenbogaard, R. E., Mynett, A., & Verwey, A. (2007) · Journal of Hydraulic Research · doi:10.1080/00221686.2007.9521778 · Cited by 484
Self-citationGenetic programming in water resources engineering: a state-of-the-art review
Danandeh Mehr, A., Nourani, V., Kahya, E., Hrnjica, B., Sattar, A. M. A., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.043 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events
Frame, J. M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Gauch, M., Shalev, G., Gilon, O., Qualls, L. M., Gupta, H. V., & Nearing, G. S. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Herath, H. M. V. V., Chadalawada, J., & Babovic, V.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2021-08-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4373-4401
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W3092962781
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall–runoff modelling: towards distributed modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-25-4373-2021
- The paper
- Herath, H. M. V. V., Chadalawada, J., & Babovic, V. (2021). Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall–runoff modelling: towards distributed modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4373-2021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.