The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Deep learning is becoming an increasingly important way to produce accurate hydrological predictions across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. Uncertainty estimations are critical for actionable hydrological prediction, and while standardized community benchmarks are becoming an increasingly important part of hydrological model development and research, similar tools for benchmarking uncertainty estimation are lacking. This contribution demonstrates that accurate uncertainty predictions can be obtained with deep learning. We establish an uncertainty estimation benchmarking procedure and present four deep learning baselines. Three baselines are based on mixture density networks, and one is based on Monte Carlo dropout. The results indicate that these approaches constitute strong baselines, especially the former ones. Additionally, we provide a post hoc model analysis to put forward some qualitative understanding of the resulting models. The analysis extends the notion of performance and shows that the model learns nuanced behaviors to account for different situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Self-citationObtaining well calibrated probabilities using Bayesian binning
Pakdaman Naeini, M., Cooper, G., & Hauskrecht, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9602 · Cited by 991
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Hochreiter, S., & Nearing, G. S. (2021) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-25-2685-2021 · Cited by 213
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events
Frame, J. M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Gauch, M., Shalev, G., Gilon, O., Qualls, L. M., Gupta, H. V., & Nearing, G. S. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022 · Cited by 396
Self-citationRainfall–runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single Long Short-Term Memory network
Gauch, M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Nearing, G., Lin, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2021) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021 · Cited by 363
Self-citationTripathy, K. P., & Mishra, A. K. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130458 · Cited by 336
Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework
Nevo, S., Morin, E., Gerzi Rosenthal, A., Metzger, A., Barshai, C., Weitzner, D., Voloshin, D., Kratzert, F., Elidan, G., Dror, G., et al. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-4013-2022 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klotz, D., Kratzert, F., Gauch, M., Keefe Sampson, A., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., & Nearing, G.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2022-03-31
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1673-1693
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W4220683755
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-26-1673-2022
- The paper
- Klotz, D., Kratzert, F., Gauch, M., Keefe Sampson, A., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., & Nearing, G. (2022). Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1673-2022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.