Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Abstract
Abstract. Although now over 100 years old, the classification of climate originally formulated by Wladimir Köppen and modified by his collaborators and successors, is still in widespread use. It is widely used in teaching school and undergraduate courses on climate. It is also still in regular use by researchers across a range of disciplines as a basis for climatic regionalisation of variables and for assessing the output of global climate models. Here we have produced a new global map of climate using the Köppen-Geiger system based on a large global data set of long-term monthly precipitation and temperature station time series. Climatic variables used in the Köppen-Geiger system were calculated at each station and interpolated between stations using a two-dimensional (latitude and longitude) thin-plate spline with tension onto a 0.1°×0.1° grid for each continent. We discuss some problems in dealing with sites that are not uniquely classified into one climate type by the Köppen-Geiger system and assess the outcomes on a continent by continent basis. Globally the most common climate type by land area is BWh (14.2%, Hot desert) followed by Aw (11.5%, Tropical savannah). The updated world Köppen-Geiger climate map is freely available electronically at https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/????.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The region has a tropical monsoon climate with a rainy season from May to October and a dry season in the rest of the year.
“In the Köppen climate classification (Peel et al. 2007), the region is characterized as a tropical monsoon climate and has a rainy season from May to October and a dry season in the rest of the year.”
From The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster (2019) · cites this paper as Peel et al. 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster
Cui, Y., Cheng, D., Choi, C. E., Jin, W., Lei, Y., & Kargel, J. S. (2019) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-019-01167-x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Flury, M., Miles, C., Liu, H., & DeVetter, L. (2020) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae6030047 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Aladejana, O., Salami, A. T., & Adetoro, O. O. (2021) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2019.1687595 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Hydrology and earth system sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1633-1644
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101108516
- Cited by
- 13,640
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 987 · 2025: 1172 · 2024: 1097 · 2023: 1114 · 2022: 1098 · 2021: 1238 · 2020: 1026 · 2019: 967 · 2018: 850 · 2017: 837 · 2016: 752 · 2015: 610 · 2014: 580 · 2013: 408 · 2012: 353
- FWCI
- 88.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Hydrology and earth system sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP0449685, DP0773016)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Geography and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
- Keywords
- Köppen climate classification, climate maps, thin-plate spline interpolation, temperature, climate model evaluation, hot arid climate, climate types
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review