The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ORCHARD TREES FROM UAV IMAGES
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Orchard tree inventory plays an important role in acquiring up-to-date information on planted trees for effective treatments and crop insurance purposes. Determining tree damage could help assess orchards’ health faster and cheaper. Having accurate information on the tree’s status could also help managers to plan necessary fieldwork and predict productivity. Traditional orchard inventory is often performed manually, and thus is time-consuming, costly, and subject to error. An alternative is computer vision algorithms that could automatically detect orchard trees based on UAV imagery. The objective of this study is to develop a method using advanced computer vision algorithms to automatically detect apple trees on UAV multispectral images. This task is challenging since apple trees are overlapping over the UAV images, and hence distinguishing different crowns could be difficult. Motivated by the latest advances in UAV imagery and deep-learning models, addressed the tree detection problem by exploring the two CNN models YOLO (You Only Look Once) and DeepForest for detecting apple trees on UAV images. We first constructed a labelled dataset by dividing the study area into equally sized patches. Then we manually annotated all apple trees seen in RGB images. The annotated dataset was then randomly divided into three subsets (training, validation, and testing), for training and testing machine learning models. The performed experiments demonstrate the efficiency and validity of the proposed approach for orchard tree inventory. In particular, the proposed framework achieved a precision of 91% and an F1-score of 87% by adopting the DeepForest model for tree detection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“| YOLOv5 [94] | Precision, F1-Score, mAP, Recall | DeepForest with YOLO, mAP of 82%, outperformed other models. | Apple trees in UAV RGB images |”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
YOLO-Based UAV Technology: A Review of the Research and Its Applications
Chen, C., Zheng, Z., Xu, T., Guo, S., Feng, S., Yao, W., & Lan, Y. (2023) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones7030190 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Jemaa, H., Bouachir, W., Leblon, B., & Bouguila, N.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Université TÉLUQ (CA)
- University of New Brunswick (CA)
- Venue
- The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2022-06-02
- Volume
- XLIII-B4-2022
- Pages
- 661-668
- ISSN
- 1682-1750 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-9034
- OpenAlex
- W4281691126
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- R-libre (Université Téluq) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Keywords
- apple, UAV imagery, multispectral imagery, YOLO, DeepForest, object detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review