Generation of High Resolution Global DSM from ALOS PRISM
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping (PRISM), one of onboard sensors carried on the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS), was designed to generate worldwide topographic data with its optical stereoscopic observation. The sensor consists of three independent panchromatic radiometers for viewing forward, nadir, and backward in 2.5 m ground resolution producing a triplet stereoscopic image along its track. The sensor had observed huge amount of stereo images all over the world during the mission life of the satellite from 2006 through 2011. We have semi-automatically processed Digital Surface Model (DSM) data with the image archives in some limited areas. The height accuracy of the dataset was estimated at less than 5 m (rms) from the evaluation with ground control points (GCPs) or reference DSMs derived from the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Then, we decided to process the global DSM datasets from all available archives of PRISM stereo images by the end of March 2016. This paper briefly reports on the latest processing algorithms for the global DSM datasets as well as their preliminary results on some test sites. The accuracies and error characteristics of datasets are analyzed and discussed on various fields by the comparison with existing global datasets such as Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) data and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data, as well as the GCPs and the reference airborne LiDAR/DSM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The less accuracy of AW3D30 is due to the lack of data stacks which can mitigate blunders of image matching or missing masks.
“Again, the less accuracy of AW3D30 is due to the lack of data stacks which can mitigate blunders of the image matching or missing masks (Takaku, Tadono, and Tsutsui 2014).”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Takaku, Tadono, and Tsutsui 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yap, L., Kandé, L. H., Nouayou, R., Kamguia, J., Ngouh, N. A., & Makuate, M. B. (2019) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1458163 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Takaku, J., Tadono, T., & Tsutsui, K.
- Affiliations
- Remote Sensing Technology Center of Japan (JP)
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- NTT DATA Group Corporation (Japan) (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-04-23
- Volume
- XL-4
- Pages
- 243-248
- ISSN
- 1682-1750 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-9034
- OpenAlex
- W2162263667
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Keywords
- ALOS PRISM, digital surface model, stereo image processing, height accuracy, airborne lidar validation, ground control points, satellite altimetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review