Cited by 275Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Generation of High Resolution Global DSM from ALOS PRISM

Open access
Takaku, J., Tadono, T., Tsutsui, K.·2014·The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

Abstract

Abstract. Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping (PRISM), one of onboard sensors carried on the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS), was designed to generate worldwide topographic data with its optical stereoscopic observation. The sensor consists of three independent panchromatic radiometers for viewing forward, nadir, and backward in 2.5 m ground resolution producing a triplet stereoscopic image along its track. The sensor had observed huge amount of stereo images all over the world during the mission life of the satellite from 2006 through 2011. We have semi-automatically processed Digital Surface Model (DSM) data with the image archives in some limited areas. The height accuracy of the dataset was estimated at less than 5 m (rms) from the evaluation with ground control points (GCPs) or reference DSMs derived from the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). Then, we decided to process the global DSM datasets from all available archives of PRISM stereo images by the end of March 2016. This paper briefly reports on the latest processing algorithms for the global DSM datasets as well as their preliminary results on some test sites. The accuracies and error characteristics of datasets are analyzed and discussed on various fields by the comparison with existing global datasets such as Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) data and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data, as well as the GCPs and the reference airborne LiDAR/DSM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-4-243-2014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takaku, J., Tadono, T., & Tsutsui, K.
Affiliations
  • Remote Sensing Technology Center of Japan (JP)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • NTT DATA Group Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Venue
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Published
2014-04-23
Volume
XL-4
Pages
243-248
ISSN
  • 1682-1750 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-9034
OpenAlex
W2162263667
Cited by
275
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Keywords
ALOS PRISM, digital surface model, stereo image processing, height accuracy, airborne lidar validation, ground control points, satellite altimetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review