GENERATION OF THE 30 M-MESH GLOBAL DIGITAL SURFACE MODEL BY ALOS PRISM
Open accessAbstract
Topographical information is fundamental to many geo-spatial related information and applications on Earth. Remote sensing satellites have the advantage in such fields because they are capable of global observation and repeatedly. Several satellite-based digital elevation datasets were provided to examine global terrains with medium resolutions e.g. the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), the global digital elevation model by the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER GDEM). A new global digital surface model (DSM) dataset using the archived data of the Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping (PRISM) onboard the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS, nicknamed “Daichi”) has been completed on March 2016 by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) collaborating with NTT DATA Corp. and Remote Sensing Technology Center, Japan. This project is called “ALOS World 3D” (AW3D), and its dataset consists of the global DSM dataset with 0.15 arcsec. pixel spacing (approx. 5 m mesh) and ortho-rectified PRISM image with 2.5 m resolution. JAXA is also processing the global DSM with 1 arcsec. spacing (approx. 30 m mesh) based on the AW3D DSM dataset, and partially releasing it free of charge, which calls “ALOS World 3D 30 m mesh” (AW3D30). The global AW3D30 dataset will be released on May 2016. This paper describes the processing status, a preliminary validation result of the AW3D30 DSM dataset, and its public release status. As a summary of the preliminary validation of AW3D30 DSM, 4.40 m (RMSE) of the height accuracy of the dataset was confirmed using 5,121 independent check points distributed in the world.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AW3D30, SRTM 1, and ASTER GDEM 2 datasets used in this study are Digital Surface Models (DSMs) that include heights of surface features such as canopy.
“In this study, the space-based AW3D30, SRTM 1 and ASTER GDEM 2 data sets used are Digital Surface Models (DSMs), as they provide heights of surface features, including the canopy.”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Tadono et al. 2016
Section 3.4 identifies AW3D30 as a DSM. The Introduction describes SRTM and ASTER GDEM as digital elevation models, including the 1-arcsecond SRTM release and ASTER GDEM’s second version; it does not identify those datasets as DSMs or say that any of the three provides canopy heights. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe negative mean error for AW3D30 obtained in this study was confirmed by the validation of AW3D30 DSM datasets conducted in Japan and other foreign countries, showing a mean error of -0.44 m in these areas.
“The negative mean error for AW3D30 obtained in this study was confirmed by the validation of AW3D30 DSM datasets conducting in Japan area and another foreign countries (Tadono et al. 2016) showing a mean error of -0.44 m in these areas.”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Tadono et al. 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Iwata, T., T. Tadono, T. Kawahara, and M. Abe, 2008. Precision Pixel Geolocation Determination for the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS). Proc. 59th International Astronautical Congress.
- Shimada, M., T. Tadono, and A. Rosenqvist, 2010. Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) and Monitoring Global Environmental Change. Proc. the IEEE, 98(5), pp. 780-799.
- Tachikawa, T., M. Hato, M. Kaku, and A. Iwasaki, 2011. The characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. Proc. IGARSS 2011, IEEE, CD-ROM.
- Tadono, T., M. Shimada, H. Murakami, and J. Takaku, 2009. Calibration of PRISM and AVNIR-2 onboard ALOS "Daichi". Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 47(12), pp. 4042-4050.
- Tadono, T, T. Iwata, M. Shimada, J. Takaku, and S. Kawamoto, 2010. Updated results of calibration and validation of PRISM onboard ALOS. Proc. IGARSS 2010, IEEE, CD-ROM.
- Takaku, J. and T. Tadono, 2009a. PRISM on-orbit geometric calibration and DSM performance. Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 47(12), pp. 4060-4073.
- Takaku, J. and T. Tadono, 2009b. High resolution DSM generation from ALOS PRISM -Status updates on over three year operations-. Proc. IGARSS 2009, IEEE, CD-ROM.
- Takaku, J. and T. Tadono, 2010. High resolution DSM generation from ALOS PRISM -Processing status and influence of attitude fluctuation-. Proc. IGARSS 2010, IEEE, CD-ROM.
- Takaku, J. and T. Tadono, 2011. High resolution DSM generation from ALOS PRISM -Archiving and mosaicing-. Proc. IGARSS 2011, IEEE, CD-ROM.
- Takaku, J., T. Tadono, K. Tsutsui, and M. Ichikawa, 2016. Validation of 'AW3D' Global DSM Generated from ALOS PRISM, Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, ISPRS, submitted.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yap, L., Kandé, L. H., Nouayou, R., Kamguia, J., Ngouh, N. A., & Makuate, M. B. (2019) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1458163 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tadono, T., Nagai, H., Ishida, H., Oda, F., Naito, S., Minakawa, K., & Iwamoto, H.
- Affiliations
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2016-06-13
- Volume
- XLI-B4
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 1682-1750 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-9034
- OpenAlex
- W2437003282
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 26.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
- Keywords
- ALOS PRISM, AW3D30, digital elevation model, stereo satellite imagery, topographic mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review