Cited by 2,339Landslides and related hazardsTree Root and Stability StudiesSoil erosion and sediment transport

Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016

Open access
Froude, Melanie J., Petley, David N.·2018·Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Landslides are a ubiquitous hazard in terrestrial environments with slopes, incurring human fatalities in urban settlements, along transport corridors and at sites of rural industry. Assessment of landslide risk requires high-quality landslide databases. Recently, global landslide databases have shown the extent to which landslides impact on society and identified areas most at risk. Previous global analysis has focused on rainfall-triggered landslides over short ∼ 5-year observation periods. This paper presents spatiotemporal analysis of a global dataset of fatal non-seismic landslides, covering the period from January 2004 to December 2016. The data show that in total 55 997 people were killed in 4862 distinct landslide events. The spatial distribution of landslides is heterogeneous, with Asia representing the dominant geographical area. There are high levels of interannual variation in the occurrence of landslides. Although more active years coincide with recognised patterns of regional rainfall driven by climate anomalies, climate modes (such as El Niño–Southern Oscillation) cannot yet be related to landsliding, requiring a landslide dataset of 30+ years. Our analysis demonstrates that landslide occurrence triggered by human activity is increasing, in particular in relation to construction, illegal mining and hill cutting. This supports notions that human disturbance may be more detrimental to future landslide incidence than climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Froude and Petley (2018) dataset, Freetown is a mountainous, hazard-prone area where at least six landslides occurred between 2014 and 2016.

    “According to this dataset, Freetown is a mountainous, hazard -prone area where at least six landslides have occurred between 2014 and 2016 (ESRI ArcGIS online 2018).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Froude, M. J., & Petley, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Froude, Melanie J.
  • Petley, David N.
Venue
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Published
2018-08-23
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
2161-2181
ISSN
  • 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1684-9981
OpenAlex
W2792546905
Cited by
2,339
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 400 · 2025: 395 · 2024: 374 · 2023: 304 · 2022: 318 · 2021: 276 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
239.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Biogeosciences (European Geosciences Union) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N000315, NE/N000315/1, NE/N000315/2, NE/I00842X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Tree Root and Stability Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
landslide fatalities, landslide database, rainfall-induced landslides, climate anomalies, ENSO, human disturbance, construction, illegal mining, spatio-temporal analysis, landslide risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review