Cited by 27Seismology and Earthquake StudiesDisaster Management and ResiliencePublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Brief communication: Effective earthquake early warning systems: appropriate messaging and public awareness roles

Open access
Zhang, Meng, Qiao, Xue, Seyler, Barnabas C., Di, Baofeng, Wang, Yuan, Tang, Ya·2021·Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The earthquake early warning systems (EEWSs) in China have achieved great progress, with warning alerts being successfully delivered to the public in some regions. We examined the performance of the EEWS in China's Sichuan Province during the 2019 Changning earthquake. Although its technical effectiveness was tested with the first alert released 10 s after the earthquake, we found that a big gap existed between the EEWS's message and the public's response. We highlight the importance of EEWS alert effectiveness and public participation for long-term resiliency, such as delivering useful alert messages through appropriate communication channels and training people to understand and properly respond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/nhess-21-3243-2021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. found that although China's Earthquake Early Warning system delivered a technically accurate alert within 10 seconds during the 2019 Changning earthquake, a substantial gap remained between alert delivery and appropriate public response.

    “For example, Zhang et al. [22] found that although China's EEW system delivered a technically accurate alert within 10 seconds during the 2019 Changning earthquake, a substantial gap remained between alert delivery and appropriate public responseillustrating that awareness of EEW alone is insufficient without accompanying education on protective actions.”

    From A comparative study on Earthquake Preparedness of Japanese and International Students in a Nankai Trough Earthquake-threatened Area in Shikoku, Japan (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effectiveness of Earthquake Early Warning depends not only on technical performance but also on public awareness, knowledge of system functionality and limitations, message comprehension, and preparedness education.

    “However, the effectiveness of EEW depends not only on technical performance but also on public awareness, knowledge of system functionality and limitations, message comprehension, and preparedness education [22][23][24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Allen, R. M. and Melgar, D.: Earthquake early warning: Advances, scientific challenges, and societal needs, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 47, 361–388, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060457, 2019. · DOI
  2. Allen, R. M., Gasparini, P., Kamigaichi, O., and Böse, M.: The status of earthquake early warning around the World: An introductory overview, Seismol. Res. Lett., 80, 682–693, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.682, 2009. · DOI
  3. Becker, J. S., Potter, S. H., Prasanna, R., Tan, M. L., Payne, B. A., Holden, C., Horspool, N., Smith, R., and Johnston, D. M.: Scoping the potential for earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: A sectoral analysis of perceived benefits and challenges, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 51, 101765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101765, 2020a. · DOI
  4. Becker, J. S., Potter, S. H., Vinnell, L. J., Nakayachi, K., McBride, S. K., and Johnston, D. M.: Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 7, 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00613-9, 2020b. · DOI
  5. Cremen, G. and Galasso, C.: Earthquake early warning: Recent advances and perspectives, Earth-Sci. Rev., 205, 103184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184, 2020. · DOI
  6. Fujinawa, Y. and Noda, Y.: Japan's earthquake early warning system on 11 March 2011: Performance, shortcomings, and changes, Earthq. Spectra, 29, s341–s368, https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000127, 2013. · DOI
  7. Hoshiba, M. and Ozaki, T.: Earthquake early warning and tsunami warning of the Japan Meteorological Agency, and their performance in the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0), in: Early Warning for Geological Disasters, edited by: Wenzel, F. and Zschau, J., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12233-0, 2014. · DOI
  8. Ji, J., Gao, Y., Lü, Q., Wu, Z., Zhang, W., and Zhang, C.: China's early warning system progress, Science, 365, 332, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4550, 2019. · DOI
  9. Kamigaichi, O., Saito, M., Doi, K., Matsumori, T., Tsukada, S., Takeda, K., Shimoyama, T., Nakamura, K., Kiyomoto, M., and Watanabe, Y.: Earthquake early warning in Japan: Warning the general public and future prospects, Seismol. Res. Lett., 80, 717–726, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.717, 2009. · DOI
  10. Lee Abbott, M. and McKinney, J. (Eds.): Understanding and Applying Research Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, USA, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118647325, 2013. · DOI
  11. Nakayachi, K., Becker, J., Potter, S., and Dixon, M.: Residents' reactions to earthquake early warnings in Japan, Risk Anal., 39, 1723–1740, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13306, 2019. · DOI
  12. Peng, C., Ma, Q., Jiang, P., Huang, W., Yang, D., Peng, H., Chen, L., and Yang, J.: Performance of a hybrid demonstration earthquake early warning system in the sichuan-yunnan border region, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91, 835–846, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190101, 2020. · DOI
  13. Peng, H., Wu, Z., Wu, Y. M., Yu, S., Zhang, D., and Huang, W.: Developing a prototype earthquake early warning system in the Beijing capital region, Seismol. Res. Lett., 82, 394–403, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.3.394, 2011. · DOI
  14. Santos-Reyes, J.: How useful are earthquake early warnings? The case of the 2017 earthquakes in Mexico city, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 40, 101148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101148, 2019. · DOI
  15. Strauss, J. A. and Allen, R. M.: Benefits and costs of earthquake early warning, Seismol. Res. Lett., 87, 765–772, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150149, 2016. · DOI
  16. Sutton, J., Fischer, L., James, L. E., and Sheff, S. E.: Earthquake early warning message testing: Visual attention, behavioral responses, and message perceptions, Int. J. Disast. Risk Re., 49, 101664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101664, 2020. · DOI
  17. Zhang, H., Jin, X., Wei, Y., Li, J., Kang, L., Wang, S., Huang, L., and Yu, P.: An earthquake early warning system in Fujian, China, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 106, 755–765, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150143, 2016. · DOI

Authors
Zhang, M., Qiao, X., Seyler, B. C., Di, B., Wang, Y., & Tang, Y.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
3243-3250
ISSN
  • 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1684-9981
OpenAlex
W3208014816
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2020YFH0023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
earthquake early warning, public awareness, Sichuan, disaster preparedness, seismic resilience, citizen participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review