The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Hazard assessment of shallow landslides represents an important aspect of land management in mountainous areas. Among all the methods proposed in the literature, physically based methods are the only ones that explicitly includes the dynamic factors that control landslide triggering (rainfall pattern, land-use). For this reason, they allow forecasting both the temporal and the spatial distribution of shallow landslides. Physically based methods for shallow landslides are based on the coupling of the infinite slope stability analysis with hydrological models. Three different grid-based distributed hydrological models are presented in this paper: a steady state model, a transient "piston-flow" wetting front model, and a transient diffusive model. A comparative test of these models was performed to simulate landslide occurred during a rainfall event (27–28 June 1997) that triggered hundreds of shallow landslides within Lecco province (central Southern Alps, Italy). In order to test the potential for a completely distributed model for rainfall-triggered landslides, radar detected rainfall intensity has been used. A new procedure for quantitative evaluation of distributed model performance is presented and used in this paper. The diffusive model results in the best model for the simulation of shallow landslide triggering after a rainfall event like the one that we have analysed. Finally, radar data available for the June 1997 event permitted greatly improving the simulation. In particular, radar data allowed to explain the non-uniform distribution of landslides within the study area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Cited by
Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview
van Westen, C. J., Castellanos, E., & Kuriakose, S. L. (2008) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010 · Cited by 1,457
Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe
Guzzetti, F., Peruccacci, S., Rossi, M., & Stark, C. P. (2007) · Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics · doi:10.1007/s00703-007-0262-7 · Cited by 1,252
Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains?
Huggel, C., Clague, J. J., & Korup, O. (2012) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.2223 · Cited by 522
Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows
Wieczorek, G. F., & Glade, T. (2007) · Springer Praxis Books · doi:10.1007/3-540-27129-5_14 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Crosta, G. B., & Frattini, P.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2003-04-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 81-93
- ISSN
- 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
- 1684-9981
- OpenAlex
- W2069954085
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/nhess-3-81-2003
- The paper
- Crosta, G. B., & Frattini, P. (2003). Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-81-2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.