The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-registration and bias corrections of satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. There are an increasing number of digital elevation models (DEMs) available worldwide for deriving elevation differences over time, including vertical changes on glaciers. Most of these DEMs are heavily post-processed or merged, so that physical error modelling becomes difficult and statistical error modelling is required instead. We propose a three-step methodological framework for assessing and correcting DEMs to quantify glacier elevation changes: (i) remove DEM shifts, (ii) check for elevation-dependent biases, and (iii) check for higher-order, sensor-specific biases. A simple, analytic and robust method to co-register elevation data is presented in regions where stable terrain is either plentiful (case study New Zealand) or limited (case study Svalbard). The method is demonstrated using the three global elevation data sets available to date, SRTM, ICESat and the ASTER GDEM, and with automatically generated DEMs from satellite stereo instruments of ASTER and SPOT5-HRS. After 3-D co-registration, significant biases related to elevation were found in some of the stereoscopic DEMs. Biases related to the satellite acquisition geometry (along/cross track) were detected at two frequencies in the automatically generated ASTER DEMs. The higher frequency bias seems to be related to satellite jitter, most apparent in the back-looking pass of the satellite. The origins of the more significant lower frequency bias is uncertain. ICESat-derived elevations are found to be the most consistent globally available elevation data set available so far. Before performing regional-scale glacier elevation change studies or mosaicking DEMs from multiple individual tiles (e.g. ASTER GDEM), we recommend to co-register all elevation data to ICESat as a global vertical reference system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Contribution of the Patagonia Icefields of South America to Sea Level Rise
Rignot, E., Rivera, A., & Casassa, G. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087393 · Cited by 496
Cited by
Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century
Hugonnet, R., McNabb, R., Berthier, E., Menounos, B., Nuth, C., Girod, L., Farinotti, D., Huss, M., Dussaillant, I., Brun, F., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z · Cited by 1,910
Self-citationMassive collapse of two glaciers in western Tibet in 2016 after surge-like instability
Kääb, A., Leinss, S., Gilbert, A., Bühler, Y., Gascoin, S., Evans, S. G., Bartelt, P., Berthier, E., Brun, F., Chao, W.-A., et al. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-017-0039-7 · Cited by 367
Self-citationIce loss from the Southern Patagonian Ice Field, South America, between 2000 and 2012
Willis, M. J., Melkonian, A. K., Pritchard, M. E., & Rivera, A. (2012) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2012gl053136 · Cited by 141
Szabó, G., Singh, S. K., & Szabó, S. (2015) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2015.06.003 · Cited by 75
Purinton, B., & Bookhagen, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2021.758606 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuth, C., & Kääb, A.
- Venue
- The Cryosphere
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2011-03-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 271-290
- ISSN
- 1994-0416 (ISSN-L)
- 1994-0424
- OpenAlex
- W2029153117
- Cited by
- 1,003
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-registration and bias corrections of satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011
- The paper
- Nuth, C., & Kääb, A. (2011). Co-registration and bias corrections of satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change. The Cryosphere. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-271-2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.