Cited by 1Library Science and AdministrationLibrary Science and InformationWeb and Library Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey

Open access
Morgan-Daniel, Jane, Norton, Hannah F., Adkins, Lauren E., Tennant, Michele R., Edwards, Mary E., Daley, Matthew·2023·Journal of the Medical Library Association

Abstract

Objective: A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons’ perceptions of the library’s digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Methods: Developed by the library’s DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks. Results: Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library’s strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces. Conclusions: The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance HSCL’s services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing and the Team is currently analyzing results from a training needs survey to identify unanticipated knowledge gaps. HSCL has a long history of partnering with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to continually move forward with their work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5195/jmla.2022.1436

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]Barr-Walker J, Sharifi C. Critical librarianship in health sciences libraries: an introduction. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019. 107(2): 258- 264. 10.5195/jmla.2019.620. 31019396 PMC6466494 · DOI
  2. [2]Ossom-Williamson P, Williams J, Goodman X, Minter CIJ, Logan A. Starting with I: combatting anti-Blackness in libraries. Med Ref Serv Q. 2021. 40(2): 139- 150. 10.1080/02763869.2021.1903276. 33835904 · DOI
  3. [5]Morgan-Daniel J, Adkins, LE, Tennant, MR, Norton, HF, Hough, C, Edwards, ME, Daley, M., Rethlefsen, ML. Piloting a diversity, equity, and inclusion needs assessment to explore patron perceptions at a university health science library. Hypothesis. 2021. 33(1). 10.18060/25262. · DOI
  4. [8]Pionke J. Medical library association diversity and inclusion task force 2019 survey report. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020. Jul; 108(3): 503. 10.5195/jmla.2020.948. 32843882 PMC7441896 · DOI
  5. [9]Ramsey E, Brown D. Feeling like a fraud: helping students negotiate their academic identities. Coll. Undergrad. Libr. 2018. 25(1): 86- 90. 10.1080/10691316.2017.1364080. · DOI
  6. [10]Barr-Walker J, Bass MB, Werner DA, Kellermeyer L. Measuring impostor phenomenon among health sciences librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019. 107(3): 323- 332. 10.5195/jmla.2019.644. 31258438 PMC6579590 · DOI
  7. [11]Espaillat A, Panna DK, Goede DL, Gurka MJ, Novak MA, Zaidi Z. An exploratory study on microaggressions in medical school: What are they and why should we care? Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun; 8(3): 143- 51. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-0516-3. 31161479 PMC6565651 · DOI
  8. [12]Brunskill A. “Without that detail, I'm not coming”: The perspectives of students with disabilities on accessibility information provided on academic library websites. Coll and Res Libr. 2020 Jul; 81(5): 768- 788. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/24511/32331.
  9. [14]Stewart B, Ju B, and Kendrick KD. Racial climate and inclusiveness in academic libraries: perceptions of welcomeness among Black college students. Libr Q. 2019; 89(1): 16- 33. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/700661. · DOI · Paper page
  10. [15]Moore AC, Croxton R, Sprague L. Breaking down barriers for student parents and caregivers with family-friendly library spaces. J Libr Adm 2020; 60(3): 215- 234. 10.1080/01930826.2019.1685823. · DOI
  11. [16]Gammons R, Corlett-Rivera K, Kletscher K. Kids in the library: enacting joy in the academic workplace through the creation of a family study space. The Emotional Self at Work in Higher Education. 2020: 181- 193. 10.13016/uwqh-oaut. · DOI
  12. [19]Toner J. The role of the university library in supporting international students: a survey of practices across UK universities. J Libr Adm. 2019. Oct 3; 59(7): 812- 829. 10.1080/01930826.2019.1652045. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Morgan-Daniel, J., Norton, H. F., Adkins, L. E., Tennant, M. R., Edwards, M. E., & Daley, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Florida Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Published
2023-03-24
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
438-448
ISSN
  • 1536-5050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9439
OpenAlex
W4360849349
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
Keywords
diversity, equity, and inclusion, medical libraries, library accessibility, library exhibitions, library physical space
MeSH terms
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Library Surveys, Longitudinal Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review