The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men
Open accessAbstract
Fausto-Sterling’s engaging book helps students in a course on Contemporary Biosocial Problems better understand the impact of ideology on science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Toward a Psychology of Human Agency
Bandura, A. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x · Cited by 3,459
Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence
Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., Blumenthal, J. D., Lerch, J., Zijdenbos, A. P., Evans, A. C., et al. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.053 · Cited by 1,309
Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/01454455870112001 · Cited by 503
On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science
Goldenberg, M. J. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.031 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Slapikoff, S.
- Venue
- Radical Teacher
- Published
- 2019-02-14
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 25-26
- ISSN
- 0191-4847 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0832
- OpenAlex
- W2911682835
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5195/rt.2019.576
- The paper
- Slapikoff, S. (2019). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. Radical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2019.576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
